Diagnostic Reasoning · Nephrology, Internal Medicine & DialysisPangangatwirang Diagnostiko · Nephrology, Internal Medicine at DialysisPangatarungan sa Diagnosis · Nephrology, Internal Medicine ug DialysisDiagnostic Reasoning · Nephrology, Internal Medicine at Dialysis

Eosinophilia and Kidney DiseaseEosinophilia at Sakit sa BatoEosinophilia ug Sakit sa KidneyEosinophilia at Sakit king Batu

When the count changes the workup. Eosinophils next to a rising creatinine can be a bystander, a marker of systemic disease, or a direct culprit — the urine, the history, and the pace of injury decide which, and how fast to act.Kapag binabago ng bilang ang pagsusuri. Ang eosinophils kasabay ng tumataas na creatinine ay maaaring tagamasid lamang, palatandaan ng sakit sa buong katawan, o mismong salarin — ang ihi, ang kasaysayan, at ang bilis ng pinsala ang nagpapasya kung alin, at kung gaano kabilis kikilos.Kung usbon sa ihap ang pagsusi. Ang eosinophils uban sa nagsaka nga creatinine mahimong tigtan-aw lamang, timaan sa sakit sa tibuok lawas, o mismong hinungdan — ang ihi, ang kasaysayan, ug ang kakusog sa kadaot ang modesisyon kung hain, ug unsa ka paspas molihok.Nung ing bilang ing mamagbago king workup. Ing eosinophils kayabe ning tatas a creatinine malyaring bystander mu, marker (tanda) ning systemic a sakit, o mismung culprit (salarin) — ing urine test, ing history, at ing bilis ning kidney injury ing mamagpasya nung nanu kaniti, at nung makananu kabilis kumilus.

Summary

Diagnosis. A raised absolute eosinophil count (AEC) beside a rising creatinine can be a bystander, a marker of systemic disease, or a culprit. The urine sediment, the exposure timeline, and the pace of injury decide which; urine eosinophils do not help (likelihood ratios near 1).

Practice. Screen for organ threat first, stop likely culprit drugs, and biopsy when the result would change treatment. In drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis (AIN), observational data suggest steroids work best started early and kept short.

Safety. Check Strongyloides risk before any immunosuppression; eosinophilia is often absent in hyperinfection.

PublishedNailathalaGipatikPepalwal: ReferencesMga SanggunianMga TinubdanReng Reperensya: 41 Audience: Internists, hospitalists, nephrologists & trainees, renal pharmacists, dialysis teams Scope: AEC · AIN · EGPA · HES · DRESS · ICI · emboli · IgG4 · dialysis · transplant · Strongyloides Framing: Adult decision support informed by international evidence, with a Philippine exposure note — not a guideline Read timeOras ng pagbasaOras sa pagbasaOras ning pamamasa:
Circular vignette hero — a semi-photorealistic kidney cross-section with one enlarged interstitial window where eosinophils with bright orange granules gather beside a teal tubule; a faint blood-count trace curves around the disc.

Eosinophils and your kidneysAng eosinophils at ang iyong mga batoAng eosinophils ug ang imong mga kidneyDing eosinophils at ding batu mu

"Your eosinophils are high, and your kidney test is up." This page explains, in plain words, what that pair of results can mean, which tests and treatments to expect, and the safety steps that matter most — especially if you grew up in the Philippines or another tropical country."Mataas ang iyong eosinophils, at tumaas ang iyong kidney test." Ipinapaliwanag ng pahinang ito, sa simpleng salita, kung ano ang maaaring ibig sabihin ng dalawang resultang ito, anong mga test at gamutan ang aasahan, at ang mga hakbang pangkaligtasan na pinakamahalaga — lalo na kung lumaki ka sa Pilipinas o sa ibang tropikal na bansa."Taas ang imong eosinophils, ug misaka ang imong kidney test." Kini nga panid nagpatin-aw, sa yanong pulong, kung unsa ang mahimong buot ipasabot niining duha ka resulta, unsang mga test ug pagtambal ang paabuton, ug ang mga lakang alang sa kaluwasan nga labing importante — ilabi na kung nagdako ka sa Pilipinas o sa laing tropikal nga nasod."Matas ing eosinophils mu, at mekatas ing kidney test mu." Ipaliwanag na ning bulung a iti, king simpling amanu, nung nanu ing buri nang sabyan ding adwang resulta a reti, nanung test at panulu ing panayan, at ding safety steps a pekamaulaga — lalu na nung mekamaragul ka king Pilipinas o king aliwang tropikal a bansa.

Eosinophils are a type of white blood cell. Their normal jobs are fighting parasites (worms) and taking part in allergic reactions. A routine complete blood count shows them as a percentage; your doctor turns that into a true number called the absolute eosinophil count (AEC). A count above about 500 cells per microliter is called high.Ang eosinophils ay isang uri ng white blood cell. Ang karaniwan nilang trabaho ay labanan ang mga parasito (bulate) at makilahok sa mga allergic reaction. Sa karaniwang complete blood count, lumalabas sila bilang porsiyento; ginagawa itong tunay na bilang ng iyong doktor, na tinatawag na absolute eosinophil count (AEC). Itinuturing na mataas ang bilang na higit sa mga 500 cells kada microliter.Ang eosinophils usa ka matang sa white blood cell. Ang ilang naandan nga trabaho mao ang pagpakig-away sa mga parasito (ulod) ug pag-apil sa mga allergic reaction. Sa naandan nga complete blood count, makita sila isip porsiyento; himoon kini sa imong doktor nga tinuod nga ihap nga gitawag og absolute eosinophil count (AEC). Ang ihap nga labaw sa mga 500 ka cells matag microliter giisip nga taas.Ing eosinophils metung yang klasing white blood cell. Ing karaniwan dang obra iyang lumaban kareng parasitu (bulati) at makibage kareng allergic reaction. King karaniwan a complete blood count, lumwal la bilang porsiyentu; gawan neng tutung bilang ning doktor mu, a maki lagyung absolute eosinophil count (AEC). Ibilang yang matas ing bilang a lagpas king mga 500 cells kada microliter.

Here is the part that surprises most people: only a small share of your eosinophils is in the blood. Most live in tissues such as the gut, lungs, skin, and kidneys. A blood test sees only the tip of the iceberg, and a single dose of a steroid medicine can make the blood count look normal within hours while the problem in the tissue continues.Ito ang bahaging ikinagugulat ng karamihan: maliit na bahagi lamang ng iyong eosinophils ang nasa dugo. Karamihan ay nasa mga tissue gaya ng bituka, baga, balat, at bato. Ang blood test ay nakikita lamang ang dulo ng iceberg, at ang isang dosis ng steroid na gamot ay maaaring magpamukhang normal sa bilang sa dugo sa loob ng ilang oras habang nagpapatuloy ang problema sa tissue.Kini ang bahin nga makapatingala sa kadaghanan: gamay ra nga bahin sa imong eosinophils ang naa sa dugo. Ang kadaghanan anaa sa mga tissue sama sa tinai, baga, panit, ug kidney. Ang blood test makakita lamang sa tumoy sa iceberg, ug ang usa ka dosis sa steroid nga tambal makapahimo nga normal tan-awon ang ihap sa dugo sulod sa pipila ka oras samtang nagpadayon ang problema sa tissue.Iti ing bage a ikagulat da ding dakal: dikit a bage mu ning eosinophils mu ing atyu king daya. Ding dakal atyu la kareng tissue antimo king bituka, baga, balat, at batu. Ing blood test ing ikit na mu ing dulu ning iceberg, at ing metung a dosis ning steroid a gamut malyari nang pakitan a normal ing bilang king daya king lub ning mangilang oras kabang tutuluy ya ing problema king tissue.

An iceberg whose small tip above water is the blood with a few eosinophils and whose large submerged body is tissue full of eosinophils, beside three cards: steroids empty the blood within hours, counts are lowest in the morning, and adrenal insufficiency raises the count.

Most eosinophils live in tissue, not blood. A steroid dose, the time of day, and the body's own stress hormones all change the blood count without changing what is happening underneath.Karamihan sa eosinophils ay nasa tissue, hindi sa dugo. Ang dosis ng steroid, ang oras ng araw, at ang sariling stress hormones ng katawan ay nagbabago sa bilang sa dugo nang hindi binabago ang nangyayari sa ilalim.Ang kadaghanan sa eosinophils anaa sa tissue, dili sa dugo. Ang dosis sa steroid, ang oras sa adlaw, ug ang kaugalingong stress hormones sa lawas mag-usab sa ihap sa dugo nga dili mausab ang nahitabo sa ilalom.Ding dakal a eosinophils atyu la king tissue, ali king daya. Ing dosis ning steroid, ing oras ning aldo, at ding sariling stress hormones ning katawan pibabagu de ing bilang king daya a ali pibabagu ing malyari king lalam.

One number, three possible meaningsIsang numero, tatlong posibleng kahuluganUsa ka numero, tulo ka posibleng kahuloganMetung a numeru, atlung malyaring kahulugan

When eosinophils are high and the kidneys are not working well, the eosinophils can be playing one of three roles. Your doctor cannot tell which from the number alone — your urine test and your history give the answer.Kapag mataas ang eosinophils at hindi maayos ang paggana ng mga bato, maaaring may isa sa tatlong papel ang eosinophils. Hindi masasabi ng iyong doktor kung alin mula sa numero lamang — ang iyong urine test at ang iyong kasaysayan ang nagbibigay ng sagot.Kung taas ang eosinophils ug dili maayo ang paglihok sa mga kidney, ang eosinophils mahimong adunay usa sa tulo ka papel. Dili masulti sa imong doktor kung hain gikan sa numero lamang — ang imong urine test ug ang imong kasaysayan ang mohatag sa tubag.Nung matas ing eosinophils at e mayap ing pamagobra da reng batu, malyaring atin lang metung kareng atlung papel. E abalu ning doktor mu nung nanu kaniti king numeru mu — ing urine test mu at ing kasaysayan mu ing mamye sagut.

Three cards showing the same eosinophil as a bystander reacting to a medicine, parasite, or dialysis circuit; as a marker inside a systemic disease that also affects the kidney; and as a culprit releasing granule toxins into the kidney.

The same eosinophil count can mean three different things. The urine and your history tell your doctor which.Ang parehong bilang ng eosinophils ay maaaring may tatlong magkakaibang kahulugan. Ang ihi at ang iyong kasaysayan ang nagsasabi sa iyong doktor kung alin.Ang parehas nga ihap sa eosinophils mahimong adunay tulo ka lainlaing kahulogan. Ang ihi ug ang imong kasaysayan ang mosulti sa imong doktor kung hain.Ing pareung bilang ning eosinophils malyaring atin yang atlung magkakaibang kahulugan. Ing atsing at ing kasaysayan mu ing mamagsabi king doktor mu nung nanu kaniti.

What usually causes itAno ang karaniwang sanhi nitoUnsa ang kasagarang hinungdan niiniNanu ing karaniwang sanhi na

When to get help right awayKailan agad humingi ng tulongKanus-a dayon mangayo og tabangKapilan agad manyaup tulung

⛔

Go to the emergency room — whatever the eosinophil numberPumunta sa emergency room — anuman ang bilang ng eosinophilsAdto sa emergency room — bisan unsa ang ihap sa eosinophilsMunta king emergency room — nanu man ing bilang ning eosinophils

Very little or no urine · difficulty breathing or coughing blood · chest pain or a racing heart · sudden weakness, numbness, or a foot that drags · cold, blue fingers or toes · a rash with fever, a swollen face, or skin that blisters or peels · swelling of the lips or throat, wheezing, or fainting during dialysis · stomach pain, vomiting, or fever while taking steroid medicines.Napakakaunti o walang ihi · hirap huminga o umuubo ng dugo · pananakit ng dibdib o mabilis na tibok ng puso · biglang panghihina, pamamanhid, o paang kinakaladkad · malamig at kulay-asul na daliri ng kamay o paa · pantal na may lagnat, namamagang mukha, o balat na nagpapaltos o natutuklap · pamamaga ng labi o lalamunan, paghuni sa paghinga, o pagkahimatay habang nagda-dialysis · pananakit ng tiyan, pagsusuka, o lagnat habang umiinom ng steroid.Gamay kaayo o walay ihi · lisod moginhawa o moubo og dugo · sakit sa dughan o paspas nga pitik sa kasingkasing · kalit nga kaluya, pamanhid, o tiil nga makaladkad · bugnaw ug asul nga tudlo sa kamot o tiil · pantal nga adunay hilanat, nanghubag nga nawong, o panit nga mobula o mopanit · paghubag sa ngabil o tutunlan, paghagashas, o pagkaluya samtang nagdialysis · sakit sa tiyan, pagsuka, o hilanat samtang nag-inom og steroid.Dikit o ala yang atsing · mirap mangisnawa o kuku yang daya · sakit king salu o malagwa a tibuk ning pusu · biglang panghihina (weakness), pamamanhid (numbness), o bitis a kakaladkad · malamig at asul a taliri ning gamat o bitis · pantal a atin lagnat, mamagang lupa, o balat a magpaltos o matuklap · pamamaga ning labi o lalamunan, wheezing, o pagkahimatay (fainting) kabang magdialysis · sakit king atyan, pamagsuka, o lagnat kabang manginum steroid.

Quick-look card with eight red-flag icons around a crossed-out eosinophil count: fast-falling kidney function, lung bleeding or low oxygen, possible heart inflammation, new nerve damage, cold blue digits, drug rash with fever or organ injury, severe dialysis reaction, and gut or lung worsening on steroids.

Any of these eight warning signs means get help now, whatever the eosinophil number shows.Anuman sa walong babalang senyales na ito ay nangangahulugang humingi agad ng tulong, anuman ang ipinapakita ng bilang ng eosinophils.Bisan unsa niining walo ka timaan sa peligro nagpasabot nga mangayo dayon og tabang, bisan unsa ang gipakita sa ihap sa eosinophils.Nanu man kareng walung senyales ning peligru buri nang sabyan manyaup ka agad tulung, nanu man ing pakit ning bilang ning eosinophils.

AEC
Absolute eosinophil count

Tests you can expectMga test na maaari mong asahanMga test nga mahimo nimong paabutonReng test a malyari mung panayan

What treatment usually looks likeAno ang karaniwang hitsura ng gamutanUnsa ang kasagarang dagway sa pagtambalNanu ing karaniwang itsura ning panulu

When a medicine is the cause, the most important treatment is stopping it early. An inflamed kidney can heal; a scarred kidney cannot. If your kidney does not improve within days, your doctor may suggest a short course of a steroid medicine such as prednisone, started early and not continued longer than needed.Kapag gamot ang sanhi, ang pinakamahalagang gamutan ay ang maagang pagtigil dito. Gumagaling ang namamagang bato; hindi na ang batong may peklat. Kung hindi bumuti ang iyong bato sa loob ng ilang araw, maaaring imungkahi ng iyong doktor ang maikling kurso ng steroid gaya ng prednisone, sinisimulan nang maaga at hindi pinahahaba nang higit sa kailangan.Kung tambal ang hinungdan, ang labing importanteng pagtambal mao ang sayo nga paghunong niini. Mamaayo ang nanghubag nga kidney; dili na ang kidney nga adunay samad. Kung dili mamaayo ang imong kidney sulod sa pipila ka adlaw, mahimong isugyot sa imong doktor ang mubo nga kurso sa steroid sama sa prednisone, sugdan og sayo ug dili palugwayan labaw sa gikinahanglan.Nung gamut ing sanhi, ing pekamaulagang panulu iyang agad a pamaninaya kaniti. Manyawa ya ing mamagang batu; e na ing batung atin piklat. Nung e menyawa ing batu mu king lub ning ilang aldo, malyari nang imungkahi ning doktor mu ing maikling course ning steroid antimo king prednisone, simulan a agad at e pakalawiran lagpas king kailangan.

⚠️

Do not stop prescribed medicines on your ownHuwag ihinto nang mag-isa ang mga iniresetang gamotAyaw hunonga nga ikaw ra ang mga gireseta nga tambalE mu ipaninaya nung ika mu ing gamut a reseta

Some medicines cannot be stopped suddenly, and your doctor may need to give a safe replacement. Tell your doctor about every medicine, including pain relievers, acid pills, herbal products, and supplements bought without a prescription — a photo of each label helps.May mga gamot na hindi maaaring biglang ihinto, at maaaring kailangang magbigay ang iyong doktor ng ligtas na kapalit. Sabihin sa iyong doktor ang bawat gamot, kasama ang mga pain reliever, gamot sa asido, herbal na produkto, at supplement na binili nang walang reseta — makatutulong ang litrato ng bawat label.Adunay mga tambal nga dili mahimong kalit nga hunongon, ug mahimong kinahanglan sa imong doktor nga mohatag og luwas nga puli. Sultihi ang imong doktor sa matag tambal, lakip ang mga pain reliever, tambal sa asido, herbal nga produkto, ug supplement nga gipalit nga walay reseta — makatabang ang litrato sa matag label.Atin gamut a ali malyaring biglang ipaninaya, at malyaring kailangan nang mamye ning doktor mu ing ligtas a kapalit. Sabyan me king doktor mu ing balang gamut, kayabe ding pain reliever, gamut king asidu, herbal a produktu, at supplement a sinali ka ali reseta — makatulung ing litratu ning balang label.

Timeline of drug-induced interstitial nephritis from healthy tissue, to a drug starting, to reversible inflammation around a tubule, to permanent scar, with callouts to stop the culprit early, start steroids early if used, and a note that scar on more than half the biopsy predicts poor recovery.

Inflamed kidney tissue can heal; scarred tissue cannot. That is why stopping the medicine early matters most.Gumagaling ang namamagang tissue ng bato; hindi na ang may peklat. Kaya pinakamahalaga ang maagang pagtigil sa gamot.Mamaayo ang nanghubag nga tissue sa kidney; dili na ang adunay samad. Mao nga labing importante ang sayo nga paghunong sa tambal.Manyawa ya ing mamagang tissue ning batu; e na ing atin piklat. Kaya pekamaulaga ing agad a pamaninaya king gamut.

Steroids bring the eosinophil count down within hours, but a normal count does not mean the kidney has recovered. Your doctor will judge recovery by your creatinine, how much urine you pass, and the urine test.Pinabababa ng steroid ang bilang ng eosinophils sa loob ng ilang oras, ngunit ang normal na bilang ay hindi nangangahulugang gumaling na ang bato. Huhusgahan ng iyong doktor ang paggaling batay sa iyong creatinine, kung gaano karami ang iyong ihi, at sa urine test.Pakunhuran sa steroid ang ihap sa eosinophils sulod sa pipila ka oras, apan ang normal nga ihap wala magpasabot nga naayo na ang kidney. Hukman sa imong doktor ang pagkaayo base sa imong creatinine, kung pila ang imong ihi, ug sa urine test.Pababan ning steroid ing bilang ning eosinophils king lub ning ilang oras, oneng ing normal a bilang e na buring sabyan a menyawa ne ing batu. Pasyan ning doktor mu ing pamanyawa batay king creatinine mu, nung pilan ing atsing mu, at king urine test.

Concept chart in which the eosinophil count drops to normal right after a steroid is started while creatinine stays high, with a callout that a normal count does not mean the kidney has recovered.

Two separate questions: the eosinophil count can fall quickly while the kidney test stays high.Dalawang magkahiwalay na tanong: maaaring mabilis bumaba ang bilang ng eosinophils habang nananatiling mataas ang kidney test.Duha ka lahi nga pangutana: mahimong paspas mokunhod ang ihap sa eosinophils samtang nagpabilin nga taas ang kidney test.Adwang magkahiwalay a kutang: malyaring mabilis a bumaba ing bilang ning eosinophils kabang manatiling matas ing kidney test.

Before steroids: the worm checkBago ang steroid: ang pagsusuri sa bulateSa dili pa ang steroid: ang pagsusi sa ulodBayu ing steroid: ing worm check (pamanintun king bulati)

Strongyloides can hide quietly in the gut for decades after a childhood spent barefoot on soil. Steroids can make it multiply quickly and carry gut bacteria into the blood, causing a life-threatening infection — often while the eosinophil count looks normal. That is why your doctor may ask where you grew up and may test or treat for worms before or while starting steroids.Ang Strongyloides ay maaaring tahimik na magtago sa bituka nang ilang dekada matapos ang pagkabatang nakayapak sa lupa. Maaari itong padamihin nang mabilis ng steroid at dalhin ang bacteria ng bituka sa dugo, na nagdudulot ng impeksyong nagbabanta sa buhay — kadalasan habang mukhang normal ang bilang ng eosinophils. Kaya maaaring itanong ng iyong doktor kung saan ka lumaki at maaaring mag-test o gumamot para sa bulate bago o habang sinisimulan ang steroid.Ang Strongyloides mahimong hilom nga motago sa tinai sulod sa daghang dekada human sa pagkabata nga nagtiniil sa yuta. Ang steroid makapadaghan niini dayon ug makadala sa bacteria sa tinai ngadto sa dugo, hinungdan sa impeksyon nga makapameligro sa kinabuhi — kasagaran samtang normal tan-awon ang ihap sa eosinophils. Mao nga mahimong pangutan-on sa imong doktor kung asa ka nagdako ug mahimong mo-test o motambal alang sa ulod sa dili pa o samtang sugdan ang steroid.Ing Strongyloides malyari yang tahimik a magtagu king bituka king mangilang dekada, manibat kabang anak ka pa at mamarandam ka a ala sapin (nakayapak) king gabun. Malyari neng padamian a mabilis ning steroid at dalan ing bacteria ning bituka king daya, a magdulut impeksiun a mabanta king bie — karaniwan kabang lumawang normal ing bilang ning eosinophils. Kaya malyari nang kutnan ning doktor mu nung nukarin ka mekamaragul at malyari yang mag-test o manulu para king bulati bayu o kabang simulan ing steroid.

Circular diagram of the Strongyloides life cycle: larvae enter through the skin from soil, settle in the gut, re-enter the body from inside, and keep the loop going for decades; steroids speed the loop and larvae carry gut bacteria into the blood, often with a normal eosinophil count.

This parasite can live quietly in the gut for decades. Steroids speed up its cycle and can lead to a dangerous blood infection.Ang parasitong ito ay maaaring tahimik na mabuhay sa bituka nang ilang dekada. Pinabibilis ng steroid ang siklo nito at maaaring humantong sa mapanganib na impeksyon sa dugo.Kini nga parasito mahimong hilom nga mabuhi sa tinai sulod sa daghang dekada. Paspasan sa steroid ang siklo niini ug mahimong mosangpot sa delikadong impeksyon sa dugo.Ing parasitung iti malyari yang mabie a tahimik king bituka king mangilang dekada. Palagwan ning steroid ing siklu na at malyari yang muntang king delikadung impeksiun king daya.

Card with six exposure questions for Filipino patients before steroids — province of childhood, rice-field work, barefoot soil contact, river or lake bathing, medicines bought without prescription, and herbal products — with a note that one rural Northern Samar survey found Schistosoma japonicum in 28.9 percent and any worm in 75.6 percent.

Six questions your doctor may ask. Where you grew up still matters decades later.Anim na tanong na maaaring itanong ng iyong doktor. Mahalaga pa rin kung saan ka lumaki kahit ilang dekada na ang lumipas.Unom ka pangutana nga mahimong ipangutana sa imong doktor. Importante gihapon kung asa ka nagdako bisan daghang dekada na ang milabay.Anam a kutang a malyaring kutnan ning doktor mu. Maulaga ya pa rin nung nukarin ka mekamaragul anya mu mangilang dekada ne ing milabas.

💊

Do not take ivermectin on your ownHuwag uminom ng ivermectin nang mag-isaAyaw pag-inom og ivermectin nga ikaw raE ka manginum ivermectin nung ika mu

Ivermectin is the usual worm treatment, but the dose and timing depend on your situation and other medicines. Take it only when your doctor prescribes it.Ang ivermectin ang karaniwang gamot sa bulate, ngunit ang dosis at oras ay nakadepende sa iyong kalagayan at iba pang gamot. Inumin lamang ito kapag inireseta ng iyong doktor.Ang ivermectin ang kasagarang tambal sa ulod, apan ang dosis ug oras nagdepende sa imong kahimtang ug uban pang tambal. Inuma lamang kini kung gireseta sa imong doktor.Ing ivermectin ing karaniwang gamut king bulati, oneng ing dosis at oras makadepende king kalagayan mu at aliwang gamut. Inuman me mu nung ireseta ning doktor mu.

If you are on dialysisKung ikaw ay nagda-dialysisKung ikaw nagdialysisNung ika magdialysis

A slightly high eosinophil count is fairly common on hemodialysis and is usually harmless, but your team will still look for other causes. Tell the nurse immediately if, within minutes of starting a session, you feel itching, hives, swelling of the lips or throat, wheezing, chest tightness, or dizziness. The team will stop the machine, will not return the blood in the lines, and will treat the reaction first; the equipment is checked afterward.Medyo karaniwan ang bahagyang mataas na bilang ng eosinophils sa hemodialysis at kadalasang hindi nakapipinsala, ngunit hahanapin pa rin ng iyong team ang ibang sanhi. Sabihin agad sa nurse kung, sa loob ng ilang minuto mula sa simula ng session, nakaramdam ka ng pangangati, pantal, pamamaga ng labi o lalamunan, paghuni sa paghinga, paninikip ng dibdib, o pagkahilo. Ihihinto ng team ang makina, hindi ibabalik ang dugo sa mga tubo, at uunahing gamutin ang reaksyon; susuriin ang kagamitan pagkatapos.Medyo kasagaran ang gamay nga taas nga ihap sa eosinophils sa hemodialysis ug kasagaran dili makadaot, apan pangitaon gihapon sa imong team ang ubang hinungdan. Sultihi dayon ang nurse kung, sulod sa pipila ka minuto gikan sa pagsugod sa session, mobati ka og katol, pantal, paghubag sa ngabil o tutunlan, paghagashas, pagkugot sa dughan, o pagkalipong. Hunongon sa team ang makina, dili ibalik ang dugo sa mga tubo, ug unahon ang pagtambal sa reaksyon; susihon ang kagamitan human niini.Medyu karaniwan ing marakal a matas a bilang ning eosinophils king hemodialysis at karaniwan ali ya makasira, oneng panintunan pa rin ning team mu ing aliwang sanhi. Sabyan me agad ing nurse nung, king lub ning ilang minutu kaibat ning simula ning session, atin kang daman a makati, pantal, pamamaga ning labi o lalamunan, wheezing, paninikip ning dibdib (chest tightness), o pagkahilo (dizziness). Ipaninaya ning team ing makina, ali ibalik ing daya kareng tubu, at unan dang gamutan ing reaksiun; panintunan de ing kagamitan kaibat.

Follow-up and your allergy recordFollow-up at ang iyong talaan ng allergyFollow-up ug ang imong rekord sa allergyFollow-up at ing talaan mu ning allergy

Before you leave, know who will check your results and on what date. A kidney blood test is usually repeated within a few days, and again at about 3 months to look for lasting damage, called chronic kidney disease (CKD). That check includes your blood pressure, a urine albumin test, and your estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), a number calculated from creatinine.Bago ka umalis, alamin kung sino ang titingin sa iyong mga resulta at sa anong petsa. Karaniwang inuulit ang kidney blood test sa loob ng ilang araw, at muli sa mga 3 buwan upang hanapin ang pangmatagalang pinsala, na tinatawag na chronic kidney disease (CKD). Kasama sa pagsusuring iyon ang iyong presyon ng dugo, urine albumin test, at ang iyong estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), isang bilang na kinukuwenta mula sa creatinine.Sa dili pa ka mobiya, hibaloa kung kinsa ang motan-aw sa imong mga resulta ug sa unsang petsa. Kasagaran usbon ang kidney blood test sulod sa pipila ka adlaw, ug usab sa mga 3 ka bulan aron pangitaon ang dugay nga kadaot, nga gitawag og chronic kidney disease (CKD). Apil sa maong pagsusi ang imong presyon sa dugo, urine albumin test, ug ang imong estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), usa ka numero nga gikuwenta gikan sa creatinine.Bayu ka mako, balwan me nung ninu ing manintun kareng resulta mu at king nanung petsa. Karaniwan pasibayuan ing kidney blood test king lub ning ilang aldo, at pasibayu king mga 3 bulan ban panintunan ing malawig a sira, a maki lagyung chronic kidney disease (CKD). Kayabe king pamanintun a ita ing presyun ning daya mu, urine albumin test, at ing estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) mu, metung a bilang a kwentan manibat king creatinine.

Follow-up timeline: today name the next clinician and review date; at 48 to 72 hours recheck creatinine; within 1 week escalate to nephrology and a biopsy discussion if not improving; at about 3 months check blood pressure, creatinine or eGFR, and urine albumin; and record the culprit as an allergy.

Who checks, and when: a named person and a date at every step, ending with a 3-month check for lasting kidney damage.Sino ang titingin, at kailan: may pangalan at petsa sa bawat hakbang, nagtatapos sa pagsusuri sa ika-3 buwan para sa pangmatagalang pinsala sa bato.Kinsa ang mosusi, ug kanus-a: adunay ngalan ug petsa sa matag lakang, nga matapos sa pagsusi sa ika-3 ka bulan alang sa dugay nga kadaot sa kidney.Ninu ing manintun, at kapilan: atin lagyu at petsa king balang pasimula, a matapos king pamanintun king ikatlung bulan para king malawig a sira king batu.

eGFR
Estimated glomerular filtration rate
CKD
Chronic kidney disease
✅

Keep an allergy recordMagtabi ng talaan ng allergyPagtipig og rekord sa allergyMitagu kang talaan ning allergy

If a medicine or dialysis supply caused the problem, write its name and what happened on a card or in your phone. Show it to every doctor, pharmacist, and dialysis unit, so it is never given to you again.Kung isang gamot o gamit sa dialysis ang nagdulot ng problema, isulat ang pangalan nito at ang nangyari sa isang card o sa iyong telepono. Ipakita ito sa bawat doktor, pharmacist, at dialysis unit, upang hindi na ito muling maibigay sa iyo.Kung usa ka tambal o gamit sa dialysis ang hinungdan sa problema, isulat ang ngalan niini ug ang nahitabo sa usa ka card o sa imong telepono. Ipakita kini sa matag doktor, pharmacist, ug dialysis unit, aron dili na kini ihatag kanimo pag-usab.Nung metung a gamut o gamit king dialysis ing sanhi ning problema, isulat me ing lagyu na at ing milyari king metung a card o king telepunu mu. Ipakit me king balang doktor, pharmacist, at dialysis unit, ban e na pasibayung ibye keka.

Questions to ask your doctorMga tanong para sa iyong doktorMga pangutana alang sa imong doktorReng kutang para king doktor mu

Questions people often askMga madalas itanongMga kanunay nga gipangutanaReng kutang a masyadung kutnan

My eosinophil count is normal. Can a medicine still be hurting my kidneys?Normal ang bilang ng aking eosinophils. Maaari pa rin bang pinipinsala ng gamot ang aking mga bato?Normal ang ihap sa akong eosinophils. Mahimo ba gihapon nga gidaot sa tambal ang akong mga kidney?Normal ing bilang ning eosinophils ku. Malyari pa rin bang manyirang ing gamut kareng batu ku?
Yes. Most people with medicine-related kidney inflammation do not have high eosinophils, especially with acid-reducing pills. The kidney test and urine test matter more.Oo. Karamihan sa mga taong may pamamaga ng bato dahil sa gamot ay walang mataas na eosinophils, lalo na sa mga gamot sa asido. Mas mahalaga ang kidney test at urine test.Oo. Kadaghanan sa mga tawo nga adunay paghubag sa kidney tungod sa tambal walay taas nga eosinophils, ilabi na sa mga tambal sa asido. Mas importante ang kidney test ug urine test.Wa. Ding dakal a tau a atin pamamaga ning batu uli ning gamut ala lang matas a eosinophils, lalu na king gamut king asidu. Mas maulaga ing kidney test at urine test.
Are acid-reducing pills dangerous for my kidneys?Mapanganib ba sa aking mga bato ang mga gamot na pampababa ng asido?Delikado ba sa akong mga kidney ang mga tambal nga pakunhod sa asido?Delikadu ba kareng batu ku ding gamut a pamababang asidu?
The risk is real but rare: in a large national study, serious kidney inflammation was several times more likely while taking them, yet still affected only about 12 in every 100,000 people per year of use. Take them when there is a clear reason, and tell your doctor about them if a kidney test rises.Totoo ang panganib ngunit bihira: sa isang malaking pambansang pag-aaral, ilang beses na mas malamang ang malubhang pamamaga ng bato habang iniinom ang mga ito, ngunit mga 12 lamang sa bawat 100,000 tao kada taon ng paggamit ang tinamaan. Inumin ang mga ito kapag may malinaw na dahilan, at sabihin sa iyong doktor kung tumaas ang kidney test.Tinuod ang peligro apan talagsaon: sa usa ka dakong nasudnong pagtuon, pipila ka pilo nga mas lagmit ang grabeng paghubag sa kidney samtang giinom kini, apan mga 12 lamang sa matag 100,000 ka tawo matag tuig sa paggamit ang naapektuhan. Inuma kini kung adunay klarong rason, ug sultihi ang imong doktor kung misaka ang kidney test.Tutu ing peligru oneng bihira: king metung a maragul a pambansang pag-aral, mangilang besis a mas malyari ing malalang pamamaga ning batu kabang inuman la, oneng mga 12 mu king balang 100,000 a tau kada banwa ning pamanggamit ing atamaan. Inuman la nung atin malinawang dailan, at sabyan me king doktor mu nung mekatas ing kidney test.
I left the province decades ago. Do I still need the worm check?Ilang dekada na mula nang umalis ako sa probinsya. Kailangan ko pa ba ang pagsusuri sa bulate?Daghang dekada na sukad mibiya ko sa probinsya. Kinahanglan pa ba nako ang pagsusi sa ulod?Mangilang dekada ne manibat mako ku king probinsya. Kailangan ku pa ba ing pamanintun king bulati?
Yes. Strongyloides can survive in the body for decades, so time since exposure does not remove the risk before steroids.Oo. Ang Strongyloides ay maaaring mabuhay sa katawan nang ilang dekada, kaya hindi inaalis ng tagal ng panahon mula sa pagkakalantad ang panganib bago ang steroid.Oo. Ang Strongyloides mahimong mabuhi sa lawas sulod sa daghang dekada, busa ang gidugayon sukad sa pagkaladlad dili motangtang sa peligro sa dili pa ang steroid.Wa. Ing Strongyloides malyari yang mabie king katawan king mangilang dekada, kaya ing kalawiran ning panaun manibat king exposure ali na alisan ing peligru bayu ing steroid.
🩺

For cliniciansPara sa mga klinikoAlang sa mga klinikoPara kareng kliniko

The Clinicians tab holds the full diagnostic pathway, the evidence with references, cause-specific management, and the Strongyloides workflow.Nasa tab na Clinicians ang buong diagnostic pathway, ang ebidensya kasama ang mga sanggunian, ang pamamahala ayon sa sanhi, at ang Strongyloides workflow.Anaa sa tab nga Clinicians ang tibuok diagnostic pathway, ang ebidensya uban ang mga tinubdan, ang pagdumala sumala sa hinungdan, ug ang Strongyloides workflow.Atyu king tab a Clinicians ing sablang diagnostic pathway, ing ebidensya kayabe ding reperensya, ing pamamahala agpang king sanhi, at ing Strongyloides workflow.

The bedside summary

An eosinophil count on a complete blood count (CBC) is one of the cheapest numbers in medicine and one of the easiest to misread. Next to a rising creatinine it can mean three different things: a reactive bystander signal (a drug, a parasite, a dialysis circuit), a marker of a systemic disease that is also injuring the kidney (vasculitis, a hypersensitivity syndrome, a clonal disorder), or a direct contributor to tissue damage through eosinophil granule toxins. The count alone cannot tell you which. The kidney phenotype — what the urine sediment shows, how fast function is falling — and the exposure timeline decide urgency and the next test.

Three cards showing the same eosinophil as a bystander reacting to a medicine, parasite, or dialysis circuit; as a marker inside a systemic disease that also affects the kidney; and as a culprit releasing granule toxins into the kidney.

The same eosinophil count can mean three things: the cells are reacting to something else, they are a sign of a disease that is also hurting the kidney, or they are injuring the kidney directly. The urine and the history tell you which.

🧭

The one sequence this guide teaches

Screen for organ threat → confirm the absolute eosinophil count (AEC) and the kidney trajectory → read the urine sediment and the exposure timeline together → branch by phenotype → test, refer, and reassess on a date. A modest count does not lower urgency, and a normal count does not exclude the diagnosis.

⛔

Urgent regardless of the eosinophil count

Rapidly progressive kidney dysfunction or a nephritic sediment · pulmonary hemorrhage or hypoxemia · suspected myocarditis (chest pain, arrhythmia, new heart failure, rising troponin) · acute neuropathy, foot drop, or digital ischemia · a drug eruption with fever, facial edema, or organ injury · anaphylaxis or a severe reaction on dialysis · suspected Strongyloides hyperinfection (new gastrointestinal or respiratory deterioration, or gram-negative bacteremia, in a patient on steroids). Escalate for oliguria or anuria, refractory hyperkalemia, severe acidosis, pulmonary edema, or uremic complications; kidney replacement therapy (KRT) follows standard indications.

Quick-look card with eight red-flag icons around a crossed-out eosinophil count: fast-falling kidney function, lung bleeding or low oxygen, possible heart inflammation, new nerve damage, cold blue digits, drug rash with fever or organ injury, severe dialysis reaction, and gut or lung worsening on steroids.

Any of these eight warning signs means act now, whatever the eosinophil number shows.

AEC
Absolute eosinophil count
Triage strip — the first ten minutes
1
Calculate the AEC, not the percentage, and pull any count from before steroids or anti-eosinophil biologics — those drugs can erase the signal within hours to weeks.
2
Measure the kidney trajectory against baseline using the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) acute kidney injury (AKI) criteria and urine output — not a single estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).
3
Read the urine yourself — dysmorphic red cells and casts point to the glomerulus; sterile pyuria or tubular dysfunction points to the interstitium; bland urine excludes nothing.
4
Lay out four timelines side by side — medicines (including over-the-counter and herbal products), procedures, dialysis sessions and supplies, and lifetime geographic exposure.
5
Stop the likely culprit when feasible, arrange a safe substitute, and check Strongyloides risk before any systemic immunosuppression — in parallel, not in sequence, when an organ is threatened.
⚠️

Intradialytic emergency — act before the differential returns

For a severe suspected hypersensitivity reaction during hemodialysis (HD): stop the pump, do not return the extracorporeal blood, call the emergency team, and give intramuscular epinephrine for anaphylaxis per local protocol.1 Investigation of the circuit comes after the patient is stable.

📎

What this guide is — and is not

An educational decision-support framework for adult practice, written for internists, hospitalists, nephrologists, trainees, renal pharmacists, and dialysis teams. It is not a clinical practice guideline. Pediatric and pregnancy-specific thresholds and dosing are out of scope. Test access, drug registration, and referral pathways vary by country and facility.

Opening case — revisited at each step

🧑‍⚕️

A composite patient

A 64-year-old with hypertension started an over-the-counter proton pump inhibitor (PPI) for dyspepsia six weeks ago and took mefenamic acid on and off for knee pain. Creatinine has risen from 1.0 to 2.1 mg/dL (88 to 186 µmol/L) over ten days. The CBC shows a white blood cell (WBC) count of 8,000 cells/µL with 8% eosinophils. There is no rash and no fever. What do the urine sediment, the exposure timeline, and the extra-renal examination add?

Hold the urge to name a culprit. The count is modestly elevated, the patient feels well, and the classic allergic triad is absent — which is how most drug-induced interstitial nephritis actually presents. Each section below adds one layer of information to this patient, and the decision changes as the layers accumulate.

Count the cells correctly

The percentage on a differential depends on every other white cell. A patient with lymphopenia can show 10% eosinophils with a normal absolute count; a patient with neutrophilia can hide a raised one. Work from the absolute count.

🧮

AEC = WBC × eosinophil fraction

Our patient: 8,000 cells/µL × 0.08 = 640 cells/µL (0.64 × 10⁹/L). If your laboratory reports WBC in × 10⁹/L, the answer stays in × 10⁹/L: 8.0 × 0.08 = 0.64 × 10⁹/L.

TermThreshold (conventional · SI)What it means clinically
Eosinophilia>500 cells/µL · >0.5 × 10⁹/LThe usual clinical threshold; laboratory reference ranges vary
Mild~500 to <1,500 cells/µLCommonly reactive (drug, atopy, helminth, dialysis circuit) — still review the kidney
Moderate1,500–5,000 cells/µLOverlaps hypereosinophilia; needs a cause
Severe>5,000 cells/µLOrgan-damage risk rises; expedite evaluation
Hypereosinophilia (HE)≥1,500 cells/µL on two counts ≥2 weeks apart, or tissue HEDefines persistence — it is not a waiting period before treating a threatened organ
Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES)Blood and/or tissue HE + attributable organ damageRequires exclusion of competing explanations
Worked example converting 8,000 white cells per microliter and 8 percent eosinophils into an absolute eosinophil count of 640 cells per microliter, placed on a threshold ruler with normal, mild above 500, moderate from 1,500, and severe above 5,000, with definitions of hypereosinophilia and hypereosinophilic syndrome.

Multiply the white cell count by the eosinophil fraction to get the absolute count, then see where it sits on the ruler. A threatened organ is treated now; the two-week rule only defines persistence.

AEC
Absolute eosinophil count
HE
Hypereosinophilia
HES
Hypereosinophilic syndrome

Consensus definitions These definitions follow the refined international criteria for eosinophil disorders, which keep the 1,500 cells/µL HE threshold, accept tissue HE with a lower blood count, and sort HE and HES into clonal (primary), reactive, and idiopathic forms.2 The French national guideline translates the same framework into a step-by-step etiologic workup that starts with the most common reactive causes before reaching for marrow studies.3

Physiologic reasons a count misleads

An iceberg whose small tip above water is the blood with a few eosinophils and whose large submerged body is tissue full of eosinophils, beside three cards: steroids empty the blood within hours, counts are lowest in the morning, and adrenal insufficiency raises the count.

Most eosinophils live in tissue, not blood. A steroid dose, the time of day, and adrenal function all change the blood count without changing the disease underneath.

How eosinophils reach the kidney — four routes

Normal eosinopoiesis runs on three cytokines — interleukin-5 (IL-5), interleukin-3 (IL-3), and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) — with IL-5 the most specific driver of eosinophil expansion and survival. Eotaxins acting on the C-C chemokine receptor 3 (CCR3) then pull eosinophils from blood into tissue. Once there, eosinophils release cytotoxic granule proteins — major basic protein (MBP), eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), eosinophil peroxidase (EPX), and eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) — plus lipid mediators and cytokines. That chain explains both why eosinophils can injure tissue directly and why IL-5–targeted drugs work in some eosinophilic diseases. It does not mean every eosinophil found near an injured tubule caused the injury.

Monoline sigil showing eosinophils produced in the bone marrow under IL-5, passing briefly through the blood, and pulled by eotaxin into the lung, gut, skin, and kidney.

Eosinophils are made in the bone marrow, pass through the blood for less than a day, and are pulled into tissues such as the lung, gut, skin, and kidney.

IL-5
Interleukin-5
1

Drug-triggered immune tubulointerstitial injury

A T-cell–mediated hypersensitivity response produces interstitial edema, inflammation, and tubulitis; eosinophils are recruited variably. Untreated, edema and inflammation progress to interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy. The biopsy may contain few or no eosinophils.

2

Systemic immune disease

In eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), eosinophilic tissue inflammation and small-vessel vasculitis overlap; glomerular capillary necrosis produces a nephritic sediment. In immunoglobulin G4-related kidney disease (IgG4-RKD), a lymphoplasmacytic fibroinflammatory process causes tubulointerstitial disease, with blood eosinophilia as a frequent passenger.

3

Reactive and clonal eosinophilia

Type 2 cytokines drive reactive expansion; clonal tyrosine kinase fusions drive primary HES. Degranulation can injure the interstitium directly, and HES can damage the kidney indirectly through thrombosis or cardiac emboli. Renal phenotypes are heterogeneous and described mostly in case series.

4

Vascular and extracorporeal exposure

Cholesterol crystals lodge in small arteries and arterioles, causing ischemia and a secondary inflammatory reaction. Dialysis reactions involve immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergy, complement activation, or bradykinin generation. Timing, lot and circuit changes, and infused agents carry more information than the count.

Review-article schematic of four routes linking blood eosinophilia to kidney injury: drug-triggered tubulointerstitial inflammation with tubulitis, EGPA small-vessel vasculitis with glomerular necrosis, IL-5–driven eosinophil degranulation releasing granule proteins into the interstitium, and cholesterol crystal emboli occluding an arcuate artery, with a dialysis circuit inset.

Four ways blood eosinophilia and kidney injury connect: an immune reaction to a drug in the tubules and interstitium, vasculitis of small vessels and glomeruli, eosinophils releasing toxic granule proteins, and cholesterol crystals or dialysis-circuit exposures that injure through blood vessels or the bloodstream.

EGPA
Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis
IL-5
Interleukin-5
MBP
Major basic protein
EPX
Eosinophil peroxidase
IgE
Immunoglobulin E

What the numbers actually say

No single generalizable incidence exists for eosinophilia across all kidney disease. The figures below come from different populations, thresholds, and denominators — blood versus tissue, percentage versus absolute count, biopsy cohort versus population — and must not be pooled or compared directly.

MeasurePopulation / denominatorFindingLimitation
PPI-associated acute interstitial nephritis (AIN)572,661 new PPI users, New Zealand national dataCrude incidence of AIN causing hospitalization or death: 11.98 (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.11–15.47) per 100,000 person-years with current use vs 1.68 (0.91–2.86) with past use4One setting and outcome definition; the absolute excess is about 1 case per 9,700 person-years
Causes of biopsy-proven AIN133 patients, single U.S. center, 1993–2011Drugs 70% (antibiotics 49%, PPIs 14%, NSAIDs 11% of drug cases); omeprazole was the single commonest culprit5Biopsy selection bias; referral center
Missed AIN without biopsyFirst 60 AKI participants, Kidney Precision Medicine Project (KPMP)AIN in 22%; treating clinicians had suspected AIN in only 54% of adjudicated AIN cases6Small research cohort; not a prevalence estimate
Persistent eosinophilia on maintenance HD510 patients, three UK units; AEC >1,000 cells/µL for 3 months24/510 (4.7%), vs 1.5% in the same units five years earlier; associated with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor use (41.7% vs 12.5%); no excess admissions or mortality7Threshold, persistence rule, and equipment era limit generalizability
EGPA incidenceUK primary-care and hospital records, 2006–20192.3–4.0 diagnosed cases per million person-years; prevalence rose from 22.7 to 45.6 per million8Diagnosed disease only; all organ manifestations
Renal pathology in EGPA63 patients with biopsy-proven renal involvementPauci-immune necrotizing glomerulonephritis (GN) 78%; pure AIN 10%; marked interstitial inflammation 44%; membranous nephropathy 10%, mostly antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-negative9Denominator excludes EGPA without biopsied kidney involvement
Tissue eosinophils and chronic kidney disease (CKD) outcome563 native biopsies, JapanInterstitial eosinophilic aggregates in 17% (50% of diabetic nephropathy); adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 3.61 (2.47–5.29) for KRT or ≥40% eGFR decline10Prognostic association; no evidence that lowering eosinophils changes outcome
Blood eosinophils and CKD progressionU.S. electronic records, CKD stages 3–4AEC ≥300 cells/µL associated with progression (HR 1.30–1.50)11The study cut-off sits below the clinical eosinophilia threshold; residual confounding likely
Two identical grids of 1,000 squares representing 100,000 person-years: about 12 serious acute interstitial nephritis cases with current proton pump inhibitor use versus about 2 after stopping, an absolute excess of about 1 case per 9,700 person-years.

Kidney inflammation from acid-reducing PPIs is several times more likely while taking them, but still rare: about 1 extra serious case for every 9,700 years of use.

PPI
Proton pump inhibitor
AIN
Acute interstitial nephritis

Observational Read the last two rows carefully. Eosinophils in CKD tissue and blood track with worse outcomes, but an association is not a treatment target. Diabetic nephropathy, the commonest setting for eosinophilic aggregates, is itself a strong progression risk, and type 2 inflammation may be a marker of injury activity rather than its driver. No trial has tested eosinophil-lowering therapy for CKD progression.

The diagnostic pathway

Seven steps from count to cause
1
Identify urgency before sorting the differential. Baseline and serial creatinine, urine output and AKI stage, potassium and bicarbonate, volume status, and vital signs. Interpret creatinine trends during evolving AKI; a steady-state eGFR equation does not apply. Assess threatened extra-renal organs in parallel.
2
Confirm and localize. Repeat CBC with differential and trend the AEC; metabolic panel with liver tests; urinalysis with microscopy; urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) and/or albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR); compare with prior results. Urine culture if infection is plausible; kidney ultrasound if obstruction is possible or AKI is unexplained; peripheral smear for persistent, marked, or unexplained eosinophilia. Examine skin, face, lymph nodes, airways and sinuses, lungs, heart, peripheral nerves, digital perfusion, and volume.
3
Build the exposure timeline. Prescriptions old and new, over-the-counter (OTC) PPIs and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), antibiotics, supplements and traditional remedies, allopurinol, anticonvulsants, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), vascular instrumentation, and the first minutes of each dialysis session. Record start, stop, and dose-change dates and prior reactions. Ask about lifetime residence, soil and freshwater contact, transplant donor and recipient risks, and past steroids or anti-eosinophil biologics.
4
Branch by phenotype (table below). New kidney injury always overrides the "stable" branch.
5
Use targeted second-line tests — not a universal panel.
6
Biopsy when the result would change treatment.
7
Name an owner and a reassessment date before the patient leaves the encounter.

KDIGO AKI definition — still the 2012 criteria

Guideline AKI is a creatinine rise of ≥0.3 mg/dL (≥26.5 µmol/L) within 48 hours, a rise to ≥1.5 times baseline within the prior 7 days, or urine output <0.5 mL/kg/h for 6 hours.1213 KDIGO released a 2026 AKI and acute kidney disease (AKD) guideline draft for public review that expands the framework to the AKI–AKD continuum and adds structural biomarkers; at the time of writing the work group was preparing the final version, so the 2012 criteria remain the operative definition.14

Step 4 — branch by phenotype

PhenotypeFindingsNext move
GlomerularDysmorphic red blood cells (RBCs), RBC casts, new substantial proteinuriaExpedited nephrology review; myeloperoxidase (MPO) and proteinase 3 (PR3) ANCA, anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM) antibody, complement, targeted autoimmune and infection tests. Pulmonary–renal presentations are emergencies.
InterstitialSterile pyuria, white-cell casts, mild proteinuria, glycosuria, phosphate or bicarbonate wastingExposure review and culprit withdrawal; early nephrology input if not improving. Bland urine is compatible with AIN, and NSAID-related AIN can present with nephrotic-range proteinuria from coexisting minimal-change disease.
Vascular / embolicStepwise decline after instrumentation, livedo, blue toes with palpable pulses, low complementFundoscopy, skin examination; skin or kidney biopsy when it would change management
Stable chronicStable kidney function and urine, mild isolated eosinophilia, plausible benign causeTrend after review with a booked recheck. Persistent unexplained HE, a rising AEC, an abnormal smear or other cytopenias, or systemic signs → expedited workup.
Transplant or dialysisAllograft dysfunction; symptoms tracking dialysis sessionsDirect escalation route — see the dedicated section
Three stylized urine microscope fields: glomerular with dysmorphic red cells and a red-cell cast leading to ANCA testing and urgent nephrology; interstitial with white cells, a white-cell cast, and no bacteria leading to culprit withdrawal; and a bland field that does not exclude interstitial nephritis.

What the urine looks like under the microscope chooses the next step. A nearly empty sample can still hide active kidney inflammation.

ANCA
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody

Step 5 — targeted second-line tests

Clinical algorithm: new or persistent eosinophilia enters an organ-threat screen, then confirmation of the absolute eosinophil count and kidney trajectory, then parallel urine-sediment and exposure-timeline branches leading to glomerular, interstitial, vascular, and stable-chronic pathways, with direct escalation side routes for kidney transplant dysfunction and dialysis emergencies.

The decision pathway in one picture: check for threatened organs first, confirm the eosinophil count and the kidney trend, then let the urine findings and exposure history choose the branch. Transplant problems and reactions on dialysis skip straight to urgent escalation.

AEC
Absolute eosinophil count
AKI
Acute kidney injury
ANCA
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody
HD
Hemodialysis

Text equivalent of the figure: entry "new or persistent eosinophilia" → organ-threat screen (urgent list above) → confirm AEC and kidney change → urine-sediment branch and exposure-timeline branch in parallel → directed tests, referral, and a dated reassessment. Kidney transplant dysfunction and dialysis emergencies bypass the sequence as direct escalation routes.

🧠

Case check-in

Our patient's urine shows 15–20 white cells per high-power field, no bacteria, no dysmorphic red cells, and a UPCR of 0.6 g/g. That is an interstitial phenotype with two plausible culprits on the timeline — a PPI and an NSAID — and no glomerular or embolic features. The count of 640 cells/µL is weak support; the sediment and the timeline carry the diagnosis.

Urine eosinophils — retire the test

🔬

Test-performance callout

Moderate Among 566 patients with a native kidney biopsy and a urine eosinophil test within one week, a 1% cutoff gave a sensitivity of 30.8% and specificity of 68.2% for AIN — positive and negative likelihood ratios of 0.97 and 1.01. A likelihood ratio of 1 means the result does not move the probability at all. Urine eosinophils appeared across many non-AIN diagnoses.15

The physiologic reason is straightforward: eosinophiluria reflects inflammation anywhere along the urinary tract — pyelonephritis, cystitis, prostatitis, atheroembolism, glomerulonephritis — not interstitial hypersensitivity specifically. Use the actual sediment, the clinical trajectory, and a biopsy when indicated.

Moderate The field has moved to interferon-γ–induced chemokines. Urinary C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 9 (CXCL9) was identified by urine proteomics and reached an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94 for AIN in external validation cohorts.16 In patients receiving ICIs, urinary CXCL9 discriminated biopsy-proven ICI-associated AIN from other AKI (AUC 0.83) better than tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α; AUC 0.63), even after prior steroid exposure.17 These assays are not yet widely available and do not replace biopsy, but they — not urine eosinophils — represent where noninvasive AIN diagnosis is heading.

Two balance scales: urine eosinophils leave the scale level with sensitivity 31 percent, specificity 68 percent, and likelihood ratios of 0.97 and 1.01, while urinary CXCL9 tips the scale toward acute interstitial nephritis with an area under the curve of 0.94.

A useful test moves the odds. Urine eosinophils leave them where they were; newer urine markers such as CXCL9 move them, though they are not yet widely available.

AIN
Acute interstitial nephritis
CXCL9
C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 9
AUC
Area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve

Cause-specific diagnosis and management matrix

Read across each row: what the patient looks like, the clue that separates this cause from the others, what to do today, and how to confirm or whom to call. Drug-induced AIN and the steroid decision are expanded below the table.

CausePresentation & discriminating cluesImmediate actionConfirmation / referral
Drug-induced AINUnexplained AKI days to months after a drug; fever, rash, and eosinophilia each often absent. Beta-lactams and other antibiotics, PPIs, NSAIDs.Stop likely culprits; substitute safely; review renal dosing and volume; document drug, dates, severity, attribution confidence. No deliberate rechallenge.Early nephrology if not improving; biopsy when feasible and it changes treatment
ICI-associated kidney injuryTypically months into therapy; concurrent PPI, NSAID, or antibiotic common; extra-renal immune-related adverse events.Exclude hemodynamic, obstructive, infectious, and glomerular causes; stop co-culprits; joint oncology–nephrology decision on holding the ICI.Biopsy if diagnosis or rechallenge decision is uncertain
Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS)Fever, diffuse eruption, facial edema, lymphadenopathy, evolving organ injury 2–8 weeks after allopurinol, aromatic anticonvulsants, sulfonamides, vancomycin. Eosinophilia may appear late.Stop culprit immediately; liver, kidney, CBC, cardiac and lung assessment; admit for significant organ involvement.Dermatology + nephrology; severity-directed therapy
EGPAAdult-onset asthma, sinonasal disease or polyps, plus neuropathy, purpura, infiltrates, cardiac findings, or nephritic urine. ANCA (usually MPO) in about 40% overall, but in most patients with biopsied renal disease.Organ-threatening disease: urgent nephrology/rheumatology; cardiac screen; Strongyloides safety check in parallel.ANCA, biopsy; induction per EGPA guidance
Cholesterol crystal embolizationSubacute or stepwise decline after arterial instrumentation or spontaneously with severe atherosclerosis; livedo, blue toes with pulses, retinal plaques, transient eosinophilia, low complement.Kidney support; statin and atherosclerotic risk control; individualize anticoagulation.Skin or kidney biopsy when needed and feasible
IgG4-RKDLow complement, cortical lesions on imaging, plasma-cell–rich tubulointerstitial nephritis (TIN), autoimmune pancreatitis, gland enlargement, retroperitoneal fibrosis.Relieve obstruction; exclude mimics; do not diagnose on serum IgG4 alone.Clinicopathologic correlation; specialist-directed therapy
HES and clonal disordersPersistent unexplained HE or tissue-predominant disease with cardiac, thrombotic, neurologic, pulmonary, or renal injury.Organ-threatening disease may need urgent glucocorticoids with parasite risk management.Hematology; molecular testing
Helminths incl. StrongyloidesReactive eosinophilia that may coexist with an unrelated AKI; residence in tropical areas even decades ago; soil or freshwater exposure; transplant.Serology plus sensitive serial stool testing; treat before or alongside immunosuppression.Infectious disease (ID) or tropical medicine
HD circuit or infusion reactionSymptoms tracking connection or intravenous (IV) iron, antibiotic, heparin, or blood product; a recent supply change.Severe reaction: stop, no blood return, epinephrine. Record lot numbers; preserve equipment.Unit investigation; safe alternative setup before re-exposure
Kidney allograft dysfunctionAny unexplained creatinine rise in a transplant recipient.Contact the transplant team the same day.For-cause biopsy under current Banff criteria

Drug-induced AIN and the steroid decision

The first treatment is withdrawal of the culprit — the immune response needs continued antigen exposure, and removing it lets edema and inflammation resolve before fibroblasts lay down permanent scar. The physiologic logic for corticosteroids follows from the same timeline: if interstitial inflammation is converting to fibrosis over days to weeks, suppressing it early should preserve more nephrons than suppressing it late. The trouble is that this logic has never been tested in an adequately powered randomized trial.

Timeline of drug-induced interstitial nephritis from healthy tissue, to a drug starting, to reversible inflammation around a tubule, to permanent scar, with callouts to stop the culprit early, start steroids early if used, and a note that scar on more than half the biopsy predicts poor recovery.

Inflamed kidney tissue can heal; scarred tissue cannot. That is why stopping the drug early matters most, and why steroids, if used, should start early.

StudyDesignKey findingCertainty
González 200818Retrospective, 61 biopsy-proven drug-induced AIN, 52 treatedSteroids started a mean ~34 days after drug withdrawal were associated with incomplete recovery; starting within 2 weeks was associated with better final creatinine; almost half of untreated patients remained on dialysisLow
Muriithi 20145Single-center case series, 133 biopsy-proven AINAt 6 months in steroid-treated drug-induced AIN: complete recovery 49%, partial 39%, none 12%; longer drug exposure and longer delay to steroids (8 vs 11 vs 35 days) tracked with worse recoveryLow
Fernandez-Juarez 201819Retrospective, 182 patients, 13 Spanish centers; all steroid-treatedMean initial prednisone 0.8 ± 0.2 mg/kg/day; high-dose for >3 weeks or total >8 weeks not associated with better recovery. Each day of delay (odds ratio 1.02) and interstitial fibrosis >50% (odds ratio 8.7) predicted poor recoveryLow
Yu 202520Systematic review, 23 studies (3 small randomized trials)A meta-analysis of 3 studies favored prednisolone, but dosing, duration, and timing varied widely and adverse events were likely underreportedLow

Practice guidance Taken together, the data suggest that if steroids are used, earlier is better and shorter is enough — but every study is confounded by indication, because sicker patients and those with more acute histology are treated differently. A 2025 review reaches the same conclusion: management centers on removing the trigger, immunosuppression is reasonable in noninfectious AIN, and randomized evidence is lacking.21

✅

A practical steroid decision

Observe when creatinine is clearly falling within days of drug withdrawal. Consider corticosteroids early for biopsy-supported or strongly suspected drug-induced AIN when injury persists or worsens after withdrawal, histology shows active inflammation with limited scarring, and infection and obstruction have been excluded. A published expert approach describes initial prednisone-equivalent doses of 0.5–1 mg/kg/day across reports;22 in the largest cohort the high-dose phase lasted a median of 2 weeks, and courses beyond 8 weeks added no recovery.19 Tie any plan to a scheduled creatinine response review at 1–2 weeks, glucose and blood pressure monitoring, and infection prophylaxis where indicated. No response should trigger diagnostic reconsideration, not dose escalation.

Algorithm for steroids in drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis: stop the culprit; observe if creatinine falls; otherwise exclude infection and obstruction and check Strongyloides; if active inflammation with limited scar, consider prednisone-equivalent 0.5 to 1 milligram per kilogram per day for a short course under about 8 weeks, review at 1 to 2 weeks, and rethink the diagnosis if there is no response.

The steroid decision for drug-induced AIN only, with a built-in review date and a stop rule.

AIN
Acute interstitial nephritis
DRESS
Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms
HES
Hypereosinophilic syndrome
⚠️

Do not read a falling eosinophil count as kidney recovery

Steroids will normalize the count within hours. Recovery is measured by creatinine, urine output, and the sediment. Track the AEC and kidney function as separate lines; if they diverge, revisit the cause and the biopsy decision.

Concept chart in which the eosinophil count drops to normal right after a steroid is started while creatinine stays high, with a callout that a normal count does not mean the kidney has recovered.

Steroids bring the eosinophil count down within hours. Whether the kidney is recovering is a separate question, answered by creatinine, urine output, and the urine sediment.

The steroid regimen above applies to drug-induced AIN only. DRESS, ICI toxicity, vasculitis, and HES each have their own protocols, described next.

ICI kidney injury and DRESS

Immune checkpoint inhibitor–associated AKI

Observational In a 30-site, 10-country cohort of 429 patients with ICI-associated AKI, injury occurred at a median of 16 weeks after starting therapy. Lower baseline eGFR, PPI use, and extra-renal immune-related adverse events were associated with higher risk. Acute tubulointerstitial nephritis was the lesion in 83% of those biopsied. Two-thirds recovered. Corticosteroids within 14 days were associated with recovery (adjusted odds ratio 2.64), and starting within 3 days was better than later (adjusted odds ratio 2.09). Of 121 patients rechallenged, 16.5% had recurrent AKI, without a survival difference versus no rechallenge.23

Consensus The American Society of Onco-nephrology (ASON) position statement and the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) guideline both frame the decisions — holding the ICI, whether to biopsy, steroid timing, and rechallenge — as joint oncology–nephrology calls weighed against the cancer's response.2425 Address concurrent PPIs and NSAIDs first; they are both independent AIN culprits and ICI-AKI risk factors.

DRESS

DRESS is a delayed, T-cell–mediated drug hypersensitivity with herpesvirus reactivation. The kidney is the second most commonly involved solid organ after the liver. Use the European Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions (RegiSCAR) score together with the clinical picture and re-score over time, because eosinophilia and organ involvement can lag the rash.

Timeline showing DRESS starting about 2 to 8 weeks after allopurinol, anticonvulsants, sulfonamides, or vancomycin, with fever, widespread rash, facial swelling and lymph nodes, then liver and kidney injury, and eosinophilia that may appear late, ending with stop the drug and re-score over time.

This drug reaction usually starts weeks after the medicine, builds in layers, and may show raised eosinophils only at the end.

DRESS
Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms

Consensus A 2024 Delphi consensus of 54 international experts agreed on 93 statements, grading severity (mild, moderate, severe) by the extent of liver, kidney, and blood involvement and other organ damage, and matching therapy to that grade — systemic glucocorticoids in severe disease, with monitoring for relapse during taper and for delayed autoimmune sequelae such as thyroid dysfunction.26 Assess for Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) when there is painful skin, blistering, or mucosal erosion.

🧬

Allopurinol and human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B*58:01

Allopurinol is the commonest DRESS culprit in kidney practice, and risk rises with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B*58:01 carriage, which is more frequent in several Asian populations. The 2020 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) gout guideline conditionally recommends HLA-B*58:01 testing before allopurinol in patients of Southeast Asian descent and African American patients, and a low starting dose — lower still in CKD.27 Where testing is unavailable, start low, titrate slowly, and counsel the patient to stop the drug and seek care for rash or fever in the first months.

EGPA and hypereosinophilic syndromes

EGPA

Body map of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis highlighting sinus disease and nasal polyps, adult-onset asthma, lung shadows, heart involvement, purpura, nerve damage with foot drop, and blood and casts in the urine, with ANCA positive in about 4 in 10 patients.

EGPA can touch the sinuses, airways, lungs, heart, skin, nerves, and kidneys. The clues are often outside the kidney, and a negative ANCA test does not rule it out.

EGPA
Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis
ANCA
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody

The 2022 ACR/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) classification criteria score a patient already diagnosed with small- or medium-vessel vasculitis, after mimics are excluded: maximum eosinophil count ≥1 × 10⁹/L (+5), obstructive airway disease (+3), nasal polyps (+3), extravascular eosinophil-predominant inflammation (+2), mononeuritis multiplex or motor neuropathy (+1), cytoplasmic or PR3-ANCA (−3), and hematuria (−1). A score ≥6 classifies EGPA with 85% sensitivity and 99% specificity.28 These are research classification criteria, not diagnostic criteria — and the negative weight for hematuria means a nephritic patient can score lower while having renal EGPA.

Observational Among 63 patients with biopsy-proven renal EGPA, 84% were ANCA-positive (mostly MPO), 75% presented with acute kidney failure, and 78% had pauci-immune necrotizing GN. ANCA-negative patients more often had atypical lesions such as membranous nephropathy, and 14% were on chronic dialysis at a median 51 months.9 ANCA negativity therefore does not exclude renal EGPA.

Guideline Organ-threatening EGPA — active GN, cardiac, neurologic, or gastrointestinal involvement — is induced with glucocorticoids plus cyclophosphamide or rituximab under urgent nephrology and rheumatology care.2930 The 2021 ACR/Vasculitis Foundation guideline issued conditional recommendations only, including mepolizumab for nonsevere EGPA.29 KDIGO's 2024 ANCA-associated vasculitis update focuses on granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis (GPA/MPA) — lower-dose glucocorticoid induction and avacopan — so its protocols should not be transposed unchanged onto EGPA.31

Randomized MANDARA randomized 140 adults with relapsing or refractory EGPA to benralizumab or mepolizumab: remission at weeks 36 and 48 was 59% vs 56% (difference 3 percentage points; 95% CI −13 to 18), establishing noninferiority; complete oral glucocorticoid withdrawal was achieved in 41% vs 26%.32 The trial did not study new-onset, organ-threatening GN, so it does not support anti-IL-5 drugs as induction for active renal vasculitis.

Hypereosinophilic syndromes

Think in four bins: reactive (secondary), lymphocytic (an aberrant T-cell clone producing IL-5), myeloid or neoplastic (often a tyrosine kinase fusion), and idiopathic.2 The bin changes the drug.

Apply current labeling and local registration status; availability of anti-IL-5 biologics varies considerably by country. Organ-threatening HES may need urgent glucocorticoids while molecular results are pending — with parasite risk managed in parallel.

Reference card of four randomized trials: MANDARA in relapsing or refractory EGPA, mepolizumab and NATRON in FIP1L1::PDGFRA-negative hypereosinophilic syndrome, and MITIGATE in IgG4-related disease, each with its population, main result, and what it does not show.

What each randomized trial showed, and the patients it does not speak to. None tested kidney-specific outcomes or induction for new, organ-threatening kidney disease.

EGPA
Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis
HES
Hypereosinophilic syndrome
IgG4-RD
Immunoglobulin G4-related disease

Cholesterol emboli and IgG4-related kidney disease

Atheroembolic kidney disease

Observational In a multicenter cohort of 354 patients, atheroembolic renal disease was spontaneous in 23.5% and followed angiographic or surgical procedures in the rest; over about two years, 116 needed dialysis and 102 died. Statin use was associated with a 50% lower risk of dialysis and death.35 That statin association is observational and may reflect healthier treated patients, but statins are indicated for the underlying atherosclerosis regardless. Eosinophilia, when present, is often transient — another reason to retrieve the count from the days after the procedure. Contrast-associated AKI has an earlier course and can coexist. Steroid evidence is uncertain; anticoagulation should be reviewed individually with the treating team.

A catheter brushing plaque in the aorta releases cholesterol crystals that lodge in a kidney artery, causing stepwise loss of kidney function, and in the toes, causing blue toes with pulses still present and livedo, with chips noting a brief eosinophil rise, possible low complement, and statin therapy.

A procedure, or sometimes nothing at all, can break cholesterol crystals off a stiff aorta. They block small arteries in the kidneys and toes.

IgG4-related kidney disease

The Japanese Society of Nephrology criteria validated in 2021 (sensitivity 72.7%, specificity 90.0% for the 2011 version) led to a revised 2020 version that adds bilateral lacrimal, submandibular, or parotid swelling and characteristic imaging as supporting items — reflecting that many true cases lacked biopsy-proven extra-renal lesions.36 Serum IgG4 alone is insufficient for diagnosis. Membranous nephropathy can occur. Treatment is specialist-directed, usually glucocorticoids first.

Randomized In MITIGATE, the CD19-directed B-cell–depleting antibody inebilizumab reduced flares of IgG4-RD across organs over 52 weeks (10% vs 60%; HR 0.13) and increased glucocorticoid-free complete remission, with more serious adverse events (18% vs 9%).37 The trial addresses systemic flare prevention, not kidney-specific outcomes; check local approval before using it.

Dialysis and transplant: direct escalation routes

Hemodialysis circuit and infusion reactions

Ask first what changed: a new dialyzer membrane or brand, a different sterilization method (ethylene oxide, gamma irradiation, steam), new tubing, a change in disinfectant, or a new IV iron, antibiotic, or heparin product. The AN69 (acrylonitrile–sodium methallyl sulfonate copolymer) membrane combined with an ACE inhibitor is the classic bradykinin-mediated pairing. Urticaria, wheeze, angioedema, or hypotension within minutes of connection are urgent. Consider hemolysis, air embolism, pyrogenic reaction, sepsis, and cardiac events in parallel.1

Emergency card for a severe hemodialysis reaction: recognize wheeze, hives, swelling, or low blood pressure minutes after connection; stop the pump; do not return the circuit blood; call the emergency team; give intramuscular epinephrine per protocol; consider other causes in parallel; then record the dialyzer lot, preserve the circuit, and change the setup before the next session.

The first minutes of a severe reaction on dialysis: stop, do not give back the blood in the lines, call for help, and give epinephrine. Investigate the equipment afterward.

ACE
Angiotensin-converting enzyme

After stabilization, record lot numbers and timing, preserve the circuit for investigation under unit protocol, and set up a safe alternative (a different membrane and sterilization method) before re-exposure.

Hemodialysis circuit map from an arteriovenous fistula through a blood pump and a correctly drawn countercurrent dialyzer, with eight tagged suspects for reactions: membrane type including AN69 with an ACE inhibitor, sterilization method, tubing set, skin antiseptic, heparin, IV iron, antibiotic, and blood product.

Every part of the dialysis setup that can trigger a reaction. When a reaction happens, ask what changed and record it.

AN69
Acrylonitrile–sodium methallyl sulfonate copolymer membrane
ACE
Angiotensin-converting enzyme
IV
Intravenous

For asymptomatic persistent eosinophilia on dialysis, the UK data show it is common (4.7%), usually subclinical sensitization to circuit components, and carries no excess mortality.7 Use a consistent pre-dialysis sampling time, review the supply and medication timeline, and still evaluate non-circuit causes — helminths, drugs, and atopy do not disappear because a patient dialyzes. See Volume, Blood Pressure & Hemodynamic Tolerance in Maintenance Hemodialysis for distinguishing reaction-related hypotension from volume-driven intradialytic hypotension.

💧

Peritoneal dialysis (PD)

Eosinophilic peritonitis occurs, typically early after catheter insertion, but cloudy effluent is infectious peritonitis until proved otherwise — send cell count, Gram stain, and culture before attributing it to eosinophils.

Kidney allograft dysfunction

Contact the transplant team the same day. Assess volume, obstruction, vascular complications, calcineurin inhibitor levels, BK polyomavirus and other infections, drug-associated AIN, and rejection. Obtain ultrasound with Doppler, urinalysis and protein quantification, drug levels, and virologic and immunologic studies as indicated. Persistent unexplained creatinine rise generally needs a for-cause biopsy interpreted under current Banff criteria. Blood or tissue eosinophils alone neither diagnose rejection nor direct immunosuppression.

Observational Strongyloides is a specific transplant hazard. A review of 108 post-transplant episodes found peripheral eosinophilia in only 53% (41/77), hyperinfection in 90%, gram-negative bacteremia in half of those tested, 32 donor-derived cases (almost all donors from endemic areas), and all-cause mortality of 45%.38 Screen recipients — and, where feasible, donors — with epidemiologic risk regardless of the eosinophil count.

The steroid safety check — Strongyloides

Strongyloides stercoralis is unusual among helminths: it completes its life cycle inside the host (autoinfection), so a person can carry it silently for decades after leaving an endemic area. Glucocorticoids accelerate that cycle, and migrating larvae carry gut bacteria into the bloodstream. Hyperinfection can follow even a short steroid course, and eosinophilia is often absent once it starts — the host's type 2 response has been suppressed.3938

Circular diagram of the Strongyloides life cycle: larvae enter through the skin from soil, settle in the gut, re-enter the body from inside, and keep the loop going for decades; steroids speed the loop and larvae carry gut bacteria into the blood, often with a normal eosinophil count.

This parasite can live quietly in the gut for decades. Steroids speed up its cycle, and the larvae can carry gut bacteria into the blood, often while the eosinophil count looks normal.

Three-pathway workflow
A
Stable patient, credible exposure risk, immunosuppression can wait days: send serology plus sensitive serial stool testing (concentration methods or agar plate culture where available) before starting; treat positive or high-suspicion results first. A single routine stool ova-and-parasite test cannot exclude infection.40
B
Kidney or another organ immediately threatened: draw samples, start the immunosuppression the organ needs, coordinate with ID or tropical medicine, and give empiric ivermectin when exposure risk is high and timely testing is unavailable. Serology sensitivity falls with immunosuppression, so a negative result after steroids is less reassuring.
C
Suspected hyperinfection (new GI or respiratory deterioration, gram-negative bacteremia or meningitis on steroids): treat urgently with specialist input and reduce immunosuppression where feasible.
SituationCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) regimen39Notes
Uncomplicated (chronic) infectionIvermectin 200 µg/kg orally daily for 1–2 daysAlternative: albendazole 400 mg twice daily for 7 days. Caution with suspected Loa loa (relevant only with Central/West African travel), weight <15 kg, pregnancy, lactation
Hyperinfection / disseminated diseaseIvermectin 200 µg/kg orally daily until stool and/or sputum are negative for 2 weeksStop or reduce immunosuppression if possible; rectal or veterinary subcutaneous routes have been used when oral absorption fails

Ivermectin needs no dose adjustment for kidney function. For any planned prolonged immunosuppression, specify regimen-dependent screening and prophylaxis with specialist and local protocol input: hepatitis B serology before B-cell depletion, latent TB assessment, and Pneumocystis prophylaxis when indicated.

Three-lane workflow: a stable patient lane where testing precedes steroids, an organ-threatened lane where samples are drawn, steroids start, and empiric ivermectin is given, and a hyperinfection lane with urgent ivermectin until stool and sputum are negative for two weeks plus reduction of immunosuppression.

The parasite safety check before steroids: test first when the patient is stable, treat and test at the same time when an organ cannot wait, and treat urgently when hyperinfection is suspected.

CDC
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
GI
Gastrointestinal
ID
Infectious disease

Philippine exposure and testing note

For a Filipino patient — or anyone who grew up in the rural Philippines — lifetime residence is the exposure history. Soil-transmitted helminths remain common: a 2012 survey of 6,976 people in 18 rural barangays in Northern Samar found Schistosoma japonicum in 28.9% and at least one helminth in 75.6%, with farming, fishing, poor sanitation, and proximity to water as reliable predictors.41 Local Strongyloides data are sparse and heterogeneous, which argues for asking about exposure rather than assuming either high or low risk.

Card with six exposure questions for Filipino patients before steroids — province of childhood, rice-field work, barefoot soil contact, river or lake bathing, medicines bought without prescription, and herbal products — with a note that one rural Northern Samar survey found Schistosoma japonicum in 28.9 percent and any worm in 75.6 percent.

Six questions that turn "exposure history" into answers a patient can give. Where a person grew up still matters decades later.

Three cases — action and reassessment

Three case cards: an interstitial case after an over-the-counter PPI and mefenamic acid with an AEC of 640; a vasculitis case with asthma, foot drop, RBC casts, and an AEC of 4,200; and a dialysis circuit reaction with wheeze and low blood pressure five minutes after connection, each with the action now and the finding that would change it.

Three patients, three branches of the same pathway. Open each case below for the full reasoning.

OTC
Over-the-counter
PPI
Proton pump inhibitor
AEC
Absolute eosinophil count
RBC
Red blood cell
GBM
Glomerular basement membrane
ACE
Angiotensin-converting enzyme
Case 1 — AEC 640 after an OTC PPI, rising creatinine, pyuria (our opening patient)

Findings: creatinine 1.0 → 2.1 mg/dL over ten days, sterile pyuria, UPCR 0.6 g/g, no rash, no fever, normal ultrasound, no glomerular features.

Next action: stop the PPI and mefenamic acid (switch to an H₂-receptor antagonist and acetaminophen), document both as suspected culprits, and recheck creatinine in 48–72 hours. Book nephrology review and a biopsy discussion if creatinine has not clearly fallen within about a week.

What would change it: an RBC cast or dysmorphic red cells (glomerular branch, ANCA); creatinine still rising at one week (biopsy, then early steroids after a Strongyloides exposure check — she grew up on a farm in Leyte).

Case 2 — asthma, new foot drop, RBC casts, creatinine rising fast

Findings: a 52-year-old with adult-onset asthma and nasal polyps, AEC 4,200 cells/µL, left foot drop, purpura, RBC casts, creatinine 1.4 → 3.2 mg/dL (124 → 283 µmol/L) in five days. Lived in Bicol until age 20.

Next action: same-day nephrology and rheumatology; ANCA, anti-GBM, complement; ECG, troponin, echocardiogram; urgent kidney biopsy if it will not delay treatment. Draw Strongyloides serology and stool, give empiric ivermectin, and start induction glucocorticoids with cyclophosphamide or rituximab — the kidney cannot wait for serology.

What would change it: a positive anti-GBM antibody (plasma exchange discussion); cardiac involvement on MRI (higher-intensity induction, cardiology co-management); ANCA-negative biopsy showing membranous nephropathy (a different treatment track).

Case 3 — wheeze and hypotension minutes into dialysis after a supply change

Findings: five minutes after connection, a patient on maintenance HD develops wheeze, flushing, and a systolic pressure of 70 mmHg. The unit switched dialyzer brands that week; the patient takes an ACE inhibitor.

Next action: stop the pump, do not return the circuit blood, call the emergency team, give intramuscular epinephrine, oxygen, and fluids per protocol. Record dialyzer lot and sterilization method; preserve the circuit.

What would change it: fever and rigors an hour into the session (pyrogenic reaction or bacteremia — cultures, not antihistamines); hemolyzed blood in the lines (hemolysis — check dialysate temperature and composition). Before the next session: a different membrane and sterilization method, and review of the ACE inhibitor.

Follow-up card and bedside checklist

Follow-up card
1
Assign the next clinician and a review date — written in the chart and given to the patient.
2
Evolving or severe AKI: repeat creatinine, electrolytes, urine output, and relevant organ markers on a schedule matched to trajectory — often daily in hospital.
3
After discharge or outpatient drug withdrawal: an early scheduled recheck (within 1 week) with explicit escalation criteria.
4
Track the AEC and kidney recovery separately. If they diverge, revisit the cause and the biopsy decision.
5
At about 3 months after AKI: blood pressure, creatinine/eGFR, and albuminuria to define recovery or new CKD — earlier if needed.13
6
Record the culprit drug or dialysis component as an allergy, tell the patient in plain language, and communicate it to every prescriber and the dialysis unit.
Follow-up timeline: today name the next clinician and review date; at 48 to 72 hours recheck creatinine; within 1 week escalate to nephrology and a biopsy discussion if not improving; at about 3 months check blood pressure, creatinine or eGFR, and urine albumin; and record the culprit as an allergy.

Who checks, and when: a named person and a date at every step, ending with a 3-month check for lasting kidney damage.

eGFR
Estimated glomerular filtration rate
CKD
Chronic kidney disease
📋

Printable bedside checklist

☐ AEC and trend (pre-steroid value) · ☐ baseline and current creatinine, AKI stage · ☐ urine output · ☐ urine sediment read personally · ☐ UPCR/UACR · ☐ drug, procedure, and dialysis-circuit chronology · ☐ key extra-renal findings (skin, airways, nerves, heart, digits, eyes) · ☐ lifetime geographic exposure · ☐ Strongyloides plan before steroids · ☐ biopsy decision and reason · ☐ referral owner · ☐ next review date

Phone-friendly bedside checklist with twelve boxes grouped under count, kidney, history, and plan, from the absolute eosinophil count and trend to the Strongyloides plan, biopsy decision, referral owner, and next review date.

Save this checklist to your phone. Tap twice to open it full size.

AEC
Absolute eosinophil count
KDIGO
Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes
UPCR
Urine protein-to-creatinine ratio
UACR
Urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio

For a structured approach to staging and recovery after the acute episode, see AKI Does Not End at Discharge and How to Properly Assess Your Kidney Function.

Objective tools that pair with this workup

There is deliberately no "eosinophilia–kidney probability score" here — no validated one exists. These calculators support the measurable steps.

Objective calculators on the site

Frequently asked

Does a normal AEC exclude AIN?
No. Blood eosinophilia is absent in most biopsy-proven drug-induced AIN, especially PPI-associated cases, and any recent steroid dose can normalize the count.5
Can urine eosinophils confirm AIN?
No. Likelihood ratios near 1 mean the result does not change the probability in either direction.15 Urinary CXCL9 performs far better where available.
Does an elevated count on dialysis always come from the dialyzer?
Usually it reflects subclinical sensitization to circuit components, but drugs, helminths, atopy, and systemic disease must still be considered — and symptoms that track the session need a structured unit investigation.7
How does remote tropical exposure change the steroid plan?
It adds a Strongyloides safety step: test before steroids when time allows, or give empiric ivermectin alongside urgent immunosuppression when it does not. Decades since exposure do not remove the risk.3940
If the eosinophil count falls on steroids, has the kidney recovered?
Not necessarily. Steroids lower the count within hours regardless of kidney response. Judge recovery by creatinine, urine output, and sediment.
✅

The takeaways

Calculate the absolute count and find the pre-steroid value. Let the sediment and the timeline — not the count — choose the branch. Stop likely culprits early, biopsy when it changes treatment, and keep steroid use for drug-induced AIN early and short. Run a Strongyloides check before every course of immunosuppression. Name an owner and a date for every reassessment.

Glossary & abbreviationsTalahulugan at mga daglatTalaan sa mga pulong ug daglatTalatinigan ampo reng daglat terms used in this guide

Abbreviations

ACE
Angiotensin-converting enzyme (inhibitor class).
ACR
American College of Rheumatology.
AEC
Absolute eosinophil count — WBC × eosinophil fraction.
AIN
Acute interstitial nephritis.
AKD
Acute kidney disease.
AKI
Acute kidney injury.
AN69
A polyacrylonitrile dialyzer membrane.
ANCA
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody.
ASON
American Society of Onco-nephrology.
AUC
Area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve.
CBC
Complete blood count.
CCR3
C-C chemokine receptor 3 — the eotaxin receptor on eosinophils.
CDC
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (United States).
CI
Confidence interval.
CKD
Chronic kidney disease.
CXCL9
C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 9 — an interferon-γ–induced urinary AIN biomarker.
DRESS
Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms.
ECG
Electrocardiogram.
ECP
Eosinophil cationic protein.
EDN
Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin.
eGFR
Estimated glomerular filtration rate.
EGPA
Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis.
EPX
Eosinophil peroxidase.
EULAR
European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology.
GBM
Glomerular basement membrane.
GI
Gastrointestinal.
GM-CSF
Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor.
GN
Glomerulonephritis.
GPA/MPA
Granulomatosis with polyangiitis / microscopic polyangiitis.
HD
Hemodialysis.
HE
Hypereosinophilia.
HES
Hypereosinophilic syndrome.
HLA
Human leukocyte antigen.
HR
Hazard ratio.
ICI
Immune checkpoint inhibitor.
ID
Infectious disease (service).
IgE
Immunoglobulin E.
IgG4-RD
Immunoglobulin G4-related disease.
IgG4-RKD
Immunoglobulin G4-related kidney disease.
IL-3
Interleukin-3.
IL-5
Interleukin-5.
IV
Intravenous.
KDIGO
Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes — the nephrology guideline body.
KPMP
Kidney Precision Medicine Project.
KRT
Kidney replacement therapy.
MBP
Major basic protein.
MPO
Myeloperoxidase.
MRI
Magnetic resonance imaging.
NSAID
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug.
OTC
Over-the-counter.
PD
Peritoneal dialysis.
PPI
Proton pump inhibitor.
PR3
Proteinase 3.
RBC
Red blood cell.
RegiSCAR
European Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions (DRESS scoring system).
SITC
Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer.
SJS/TEN
Stevens–Johnson syndrome / toxic epidermal necrolysis.
TB
Tuberculosis.
TIN
Tubulointerstitial nephritis.
TINU
Tubulointerstitial nephritis and uveitis.
TNF-α
Tumor necrosis factor-alpha.
UACR
Urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio.
UPCR
Urine protein-to-creatinine ratio.
WBC
White blood cell.

Terms

Autoinfection
The ability of Strongyloides larvae to reinfect the same host through the bowel wall or perianal skin, sustaining infection for decades.
Eotaxin
A chemokine family that recruits eosinophils from blood into tissue through CCR3.
FIP1L1::PDGFRA
A tyrosine kinase fusion gene that drives a clonal, imatinib-responsive form of hypereosinophilia.
Hyperinfection
Accelerated Strongyloides autoinfection with heavy larval burden, usually triggered by glucocorticoids; often with gram-negative sepsis and no eosinophilia.
Likelihood ratio
How much a test result changes the odds of disease; a value near 1 means the result is uninformative.
Pauci-immune
Glomerulonephritis with little or no immunoglobulin or complement deposition on immunofluorescence — typical of ANCA vasculitis.
Sterile pyuria
White cells in the urine without growth on routine bacterial culture.
Tissue hypereosinophilia
Eosinophil infiltration of tissue beyond the expected range, which can occur with a normal or mildly raised blood count.
Tubulitis
Inflammatory cells invading tubular epithelium — a hallmark of active interstitial nephritis.
ReferencesMga SanggunianMga TinubdanReng Reperensya 41 sources
  1. Afsar, B., & Afsar, R. E. (2024). Hypersensitive reactions during hemodialysis treatment: What do we need to know? Seminars in Dialysis, 37(3), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/sdi.13197
  2. Valent, P., Klion, A. D., Roufosse, F., Simon, D., Metzgeroth, G., Leiferman, K. M., Schwaab, J., Butterfield, J. H., Sperr, W. R., Sotlar, K., Vandenberghe, P., Hoermann, G., Haferlach, T., Moriggl, R., George, T. I., Akin, C., Bochner, B. S., Gotlib, J., Reiter, A., ... Gleich, G. J. (2023). Proposed refined diagnostic criteria and classification of eosinophil disorders and related syndromes. Allergy, 78(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.15544
  3. Groh, M., Rohmer, J., Etienne, N., Abou Chahla, W., Baudet, A., Chan Hew Wai, A., Chenivesse, C., Clisson Rusek, I., Cottin, V., Decamp, M., De Groote, P., Delahousse, F., Duployez, N., Faguer, S., Gottrand, F., Huang, F., Leblanc, T., Magnan, A., Martin, T., ... Kahn, J. E. (2023). French guidelines for the etiological workup of eosinophilia and the management of hypereosinophilic syndromes. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 18(1), 100. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-023-02696-4
  4. Blank, M. L., Parkin, L., Paul, C., & Herbison, P. (2014). A nationwide nested case-control study indicates an increased risk of acute interstitial nephritis with proton pump inhibitor use. Kidney International, 86(4), 837–844. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2014.74
  5. Muriithi, A. K., Leung, N., Valeri, A. M., Cornell, L. D., Sethi, S., Fidler, M. E., & Nasr, S. H. (2014). Biopsy-proven acute interstitial nephritis, 1993–2011: A case series. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 64(4), 558–566. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.04.027
  6. Schaub, J. A., Menon, R., Melo Ferreira, R., Kiernan, E., Schmidt, I. M., Limonte, C. P., Yennapureddy, S., Cheng, Y. H., Herlitz, L., Rosenberg, A. Z., Henderson, J. M., Smith, K. D., Hodgin, J. B., Otto, E., Moeckel, G. W., Cantley, L. G., Setty, S., Balis, U. G., Demeke, D., ... Parikh, C. R. (2026). Acute tubular injury versus acute interstitial nephritis in the Kidney Precision Medicine Project. JCI Insight, 11(15). https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.204127
  7. Hildebrand, S., Corbett, R., Duncan, N., & Ashby, D. (2016). Increased prevalence of eosinophilia in a hemodialysis population: Longitudinal and case control studies. Hemodialysis International, 20(3), 414–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/hdi.12395
  8. Hwee, J., Harper, L., Fu, Q., Nirantharakumar, K., Mu, G., & Jakes, R. W. (2024). Prevalence, incidence and healthcare burden of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis in the UK. ERJ Open Research, 10(3), 00430-2023. https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00430-2023
  9. Durel, C. A., Sinico, R. A., Teixeira, V., Jayne, D., Belenfant, X., Marchand-Adam, S., Pugnet, G., Gaultier, J., Le Gallou, T., Titeca-Beauport, D., Agard, C., Barbet, C., Bardy, A., Blockmans, D., Boffa, J. J., Bouet, J., Cottin, V., Crabol, Y., Deligny, C., ... Karras, A. (2021). Renal involvement in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA): A multicentric retrospective study of 63 biopsy-proven cases. Rheumatology, 60(1), 359–365. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keaa416
  10. Hattori, K., Sakaguchi, Y., Oka, T., Asahina, Y., Kawaoka, T., Yamamoto, R., Matsui, I., Mizui, M., Kaimori, J. Y., & Isaka, Y. (2023). Interstitial eosinophilic aggregates and kidney outcome in patients with CKD. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 18(12), 1563–1572. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.0000000000000277
  11. Kielar, D., Jones, A. M., Wang, X., Stirnadel-Farrant, H., Katial, R. K., Bansal, A., Garg, M., Sharma, C., Thakar, S., & Ye, Q. (2023). Association between elevated blood eosinophils and chronic kidney disease progression: Analyses of a large United States electronic health records database. International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease, 16, 269–280. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJNRD.S431375
  12. Khwaja, A. (2012). KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury. Nephron Clinical Practice, 120(4), c179–c184. https://doi.org/10.1159/000339789
  13. Kellum, J. A., Lameire, N., & KDIGO AKI Guideline Work Group. (2013). Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of acute kidney injury: A KDIGO summary (Part 1). Critical Care, 17(1), 204. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11454
  14. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) AKI/AKD Work Group. (2026). KDIGO 2026 clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury and acute kidney disease [Public review draft]. KDIGO. https://kdigo.org/guidelines/acute-kidney-injury/
  15. Muriithi, A. K., Nasr, S. H., & Leung, N. (2013). Utility of urine eosinophils in the diagnosis of acute interstitial nephritis. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 8(11), 1857–1862. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.01330213
  16. Moledina, D. G., Obeid, W., Smith, R. N., Rosales, I., Sise, M. E., Moeckel, G., Kashgarian, M., Kuperman, M., Campbell, K. N., Lefferts, S., Meliambro, K., Bitzer, M., Perazella, M. A., Luciano, R. L., Pober, J. S., Cantley, L. G., Colvin, R. B., Wilson, F. P., & Parikh, C. R. (2023). Identification and validation of urinary CXCL9 as a biomarker for diagnosis of acute interstitial nephritis. The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 133(13), e168950. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI168950
  17. Chavez, C. C. N., Bermejo, S., Narvaez, V. C., Refai, O. A., Sohi, G. K., Giesen, C., Kottschade, L., Markovic, S. N., Leung, N., Lieske, J. C., Soler, M. J., & Herrmann, S. M. (2026). Urinary CXCL-9 outperforms TNF-α for non-invasive diagnosis of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated acute interstitial nephritis. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 41(8), 1457–1466. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfag016
  18. González, E., Gutiérrez, E., Galeano, C., Chevia, C., de Sequera, P., Bernis, C., Parra, E. G., Delgado, R., Sanz, M., Ortiz, M., Goicoechea, M., Quereda, C., Olea, T., Bouarich, H., Hernández, Y., Segovia, B., & Praga, M. (2008). Early steroid treatment improves the recovery of renal function in patients with drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis. Kidney International, 73(8), 940–946. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ki.5002776
  19. Fernandez-Juarez, G., Perez, J. V., Caravaca-Fontán, F., Quintana, L., Shabaka, A., Rodriguez, E., Gadola, L., de Lorenzo, A., Cobo, M. A., Oliet, A., Sierra, M., Cobelo, C., Iglesias, E., Blasco, M., Galeano, C., Cordon, A., Oliva, J., & Praga, M. (2018). Duration of treatment with corticosteroids and recovery of kidney function in acute interstitial nephritis. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 13(12), 1851–1858. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.01390118
  20. Yu, Y., Biros, E., Chang, X., & Mallett, A. J. (2025). A systematic review of treatment for acute interstitial nephritis. Kidney International Reports, 10(8), 2575–2584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2025.05.009
  21. Krishnan, N., Caravaca-Fontán, F., & Praga, M. (2025). Management of acute tubulointerstitial nephritis. Advances in Kidney Disease and Health, 32(4), 373–381. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.akdh.2025.03.002
  22. Barreto, E. F., & Rule, A. D. (2020). Management of drug-associated acute interstitial nephritis. Kidney360, 1(1), 62–64. https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000042019
  23. Gupta, S., Short, S. A. P., Sise, M. E., Prosek, J. M., Madhavan, S. M., Soler, M. J., Ostermann, M., Herrmann, S. M., Abudayyeh, A., Anand, S., Glezerman, I., Motwani, S. S., Murakami, N., Wanchoo, R., Ortiz-Melo, D. I., Rashidi, A., Sprangers, B., Aggarwal, V., Malik, A. B., ... Leaf, D. E. (2021). Acute kidney injury in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer, 9(10), e003467. https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2021-003467
  24. Herrmann, S. M., Abudayyeh, A., Gupta, S., Gudsoorkar, P., Klomjit, N., Motwani, S. S., Karam, S., Costa E Silva, V. T., Khalid, S. B., Anand, S., Kala, J., Leaf, D. E., Murakami, N., Rashidi, A., Wanchoo, R., & Kitchlu, A. (2025). Diagnosis and management of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated nephrotoxicity: A position statement from the American Society of Onco-nephrology. Kidney International, 107(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2024.09.017
  25. Brahmer, J. R., Abu-Sbeih, H., Ascierto, P. A., Brufsky, J., Cappelli, L. C., Cortazar, F. B., Gerber, D. E., Hamad, L., Hansen, E., Johnson, D. B., Lacouture, M. E., Masters, G. A., Naidoo, J., Nanni, M., Perales, M. A., Puzanov, I., Santomasso, B. D., Shanbhag, S. P., Sharma, R., ... Ernstoff, M. S. (2021). Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immune checkpoint inhibitor-related adverse events. Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer, 9(6), e002435. https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2021-002435
  26. Brüggen, M. C., Walsh, S., Ameri, M. M., Anasiewicz, N., Maverakis, E., French, L. E., Ingen-Housz-Oro, S., Abe, R., Ardern-Jones, M., Assier, H., Barbaud, A., Bensaid, B., Bernal, W., Bernier, C., Brassard, A., Brezinová, E., Cabañas, R., Cardones, A., Chu, C. Y., ... Cho, Y. T. (2024). Management of adult patients with drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms: A Delphi-based international consensus. JAMA Dermatology, 160(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.4450
  27. FitzGerald, J. D., Dalbeth, N., Mikuls, T., Brignardello-Petersen, R., Guyatt, G., Abeles, A. M., Gelber, A. C., Harrold, L. R., Khanna, D., King, C., Levy, G., Libbey, C., Mount, D., Pillinger, M. H., Rosenthal, A., Singh, J. A., Sims, J. E., Smith, B. J., Wenger, N. S., ... Neogi, T. (2020). 2020 American College of Rheumatology guideline for the management of gout. Arthritis Care & Research, 72(6), 744–760. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.24180
  28. Grayson, P. C., Ponte, C., Suppiah, R., Robson, J. C., Craven, A., Judge, A., Khalid, S., Hutchings, A., Luqmani, R. A., Watts, R. A., & Merkel, P. A. (2022). 2022 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology classification criteria for eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 81(3), 309–314. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-221794
  29. Chung, S. A., Langford, C. A., Maz, M., Abril, A., Gorelik, M., Guyatt, G., Archer, A. M., Conn, D. L., Full, K. A., Grayson, P. C., Ibarra, M. F., Imundo, L. F., Kim, S., Merkel, P. A., Rhee, R. L., Seo, P., Stone, J. H., Sule, S., Sundel, R. P., ... Mustafa, R. A. (2021). 2021 American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation guideline for the management of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. Arthritis Care & Research, 73(8), 1088–1105. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.24634
  30. Emmi, G., Bettiol, A., Gelain, E., Bajema, I. M., Berti, A., Burns, S., Cid, M. C., Cohen Tervaert, J. W., Cottin, V., Durante, E., Holle, J. U., Mahr, A. D., Del Pero, M. M., Marvisi, C., Mills, J., Moiseev, S., Moosig, F., Mukhtyar, C., Neumann, T., ... Vaglio, A. (2023). Evidence-based guideline for the diagnosis and management of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 19(6), 378–393. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-023-00958-w
  31. Floege, J., Jayne, D. R. W., Sanders, J. F., Tesar, V., Balk, E. M., Gordon, C. E., Adam, G., Tonelli, M. A., Cheung, M., Earley, A., & Rovin, B. H. (2024). Executive summary of the KDIGO 2024 clinical practice guideline for the management of ANCA-associated vasculitis. Kidney International, 105(3), 447–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2023.10.009
  32. Wechsler, M. E., Nair, P., Terrier, B., Walz, B., Bourdin, A., Jayne, D. R. W., Jackson, D. J., Roufosse, F., Börjesson Sjö, L., Fan, Y., Jison, M., McCrae, C., Necander, S., Shavit, A., Walton, C., & Merkel, P. A. (2024). Benralizumab versus mepolizumab for eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. The New England Journal of Medicine, 390(10), 911–921. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2311155
  33. Roufosse, F., Kahn, J. E., Rothenberg, M. E., Wardlaw, A. J., Klion, A. D., Kirby, S. Y., Gilson, M. J., Bentley, J. H., Bradford, E. S., Yancey, S. W., Steinfeld, J., & Gleich, G. J. (2020). Efficacy and safety of mepolizumab in hypereosinophilic syndrome: A phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 146(6), 1397–1405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2020.08.037
  34. Ogbogu, P. U., Roufosse, F., Akuthota, P., Kuna, P., Groh, M., Reiter, A., Yokota, A., Siddiqui, S. H., Mutsaers, P. G. N. J., Li, B., Khoury, P., Bahadori, L. M., Bednarczyk, A., Bouma, G., Brooks, L. G., Ferreira, J., Grindebacke, H., Ho, C. N., Jain, P., ... Klion, A. D. (2026). Benralizumab versus placebo for hypereosinophilic syndrome: A randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Nature Medicine, 32(6), 2017–2025. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-026-04315-8
  35. Scolari, F., Ravani, P., Gaggi, R., Santostefano, M., Rollino, C., Stabellini, N., Colla, L., Viola, B. F., Maiorca, P., Venturelli, C., Bonardelli, S., Faggiano, P., & Barrett, B. J. (2007). The challenge of diagnosing atheroembolic renal disease: Clinical features and prognostic factors. Circulation, 116(3), 298–304. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.680991
  36. Saeki, T., Kawano, M., Nagasawa, T., Ubara, Y., Taniguchi, Y., Yanagita, M., Nishi, S., Nagata, M., Hisano, S., Yamaguchi, Y., Nomura, H., Saito, T., & Nakashima, H. (2021). Validation of the diagnostic criteria for IgG4-related kidney disease (IgG4-RKD) 2011, and proposal of a new 2020 version. Clinical and Experimental Nephrology, 25(2), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-020-01993-7
  37. Stone, J. H., Khosroshahi, A., Zhang, W., Della Torre, E., Okazaki, K., Tanaka, Y., Löhr, J. M., Schleinitz, N., Dong, L., Umehara, H., Lanzillotta, M., Wallace, Z. S., Ebbo, M., Webster, G. J., Martinez Valle, F., Nayar, M. K., Perugino, C. A., Rebours, V., Dong, X., ... Culver, E. L. (2025). Inebilizumab for treatment of IgG4-related disease. The New England Journal of Medicine, 392(12), 1168–1177. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2409712
  38. Abad, C. L. R., Bhaimia, E., Schuetz, A. N., & Razonable, R. R. (2022). A comprehensive review of Strongyloides stercoralis infection after solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clinical Transplantation, 36(11), e14795. https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.14795
  39. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2024). Clinical care of Strongyloides. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.cdc.gov/strongyloides/hcp/clinical-care/index.html
  40. Requena-Méndez, A., Buonfrate, D., Gomez-Junyent, J., Zammarchi, L., Bisoffi, Z., & Muñoz, J. (2017). Evidence-based guidelines for screening and management of strongyloidiasis in non-endemic countries. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 97(3), 645–652. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.16-0923
  41. Ross, A. G., Olveda, R. M., McManus, D. P., Harn, D. A., Chy, D., Li, Y., Tallo, V., & Ng, S. K. (2017). Risk factors for human helminthiases in rural Philippines. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 54, 150–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2016.09.025
Dr. W Rivero, MD

W Rivero, MD, FPCP, DPSN

Specialist in Internal Medicine, Nephrology, and Clinical Nutrition. Practicing integrative and evidence-based nephrology across Quezon City, Pampanga, and Bulacan.

· Book an Appointment →

QR code — scan to save Dr. Rivero's contact info

Scan and save